Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[META] I told you so

14 views
Skip to first unread message

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.

Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.

[insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]

Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.

Tehawk

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and
millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
<St...@erols.com> shouted out:

>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.

>
>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>

In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.
Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
including myself.
Now you are gasping at straws.

Tehawk ©2000
RSPWWCW European Champion
Former Two Time RSPWWCW World Champion
Former RSPWECW World Champion
Former RSPWECW Softcore Champion

The Franchise of RSPW
ICQ #4610826

http://tehawk.homepage.com/
http://members.theglobe.com/tehawk/
http://www.geocities.com/tehawk/
http://www.fortunecity.com/tattooine/lucas/209/index.html

God Put Me On Earth To Accomplish A Certain Number Of Things,
Right Now I Am So Far Behind I Will Never Die

The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to

Tehawk wrote in message ...

>On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and
>millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
><St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>
>>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>
>>
>>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>>
>
>In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
>by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.
>Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
>story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
>including myself.
>Now you are gasping at straws.
>
>

But you're a stupid spic Chico.

--Stone

"Jesus, Mary, and Joseph! I think I just saw God and I
could've sworn he was driving a Cadillac!"

Robert Gibson's Glass Eye

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
news:3906D3...@erols.com...

> This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.

Not only that, he HASN'T POSTED, YOU MARK. As for your allegation that I
haven't posted on-topic, I'm showing 4 On-Topic posts between the 23rd and
25th, inclusive.

How many have YOU made?

> Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.

You wish, sphincter boy.

> [insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]

[inserted by proxy]

> Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.

I'm not blaming you for anyone's behavior but your own, you hypocritical
self-righteous prick. It sucks, you suck, period. Also, your erroneous
identification notwithstanding, I've posted on-topic this week, including
long rants on what workers read/post here and what things WCW could do to
maintain/elevate interest. THOSE get no responses, from you or from most of
the other people that like to whine and bitch about how bad the other guy
is. Since I tend to read responses to my own articles first, what gets
responded to is what I reply to.

No go crawl back in your hole, you whining bitch. You're worse than
useless. Or don't, if you're the type that gets off on making a complete
fool of yourself.

Oh, wait.

Nevermind.

You want something to scrutinize, I invite you to closely scrutinize my ass
hairs. You will have plenty of opportunity, with your nose buried up there
the way it is.

And I still ain't Dejong. I just think he's worth emulating, in most
aspects.

The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>
>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>
>[insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
>
>Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.

*yawn* Whine, whine, whine. Go wipe your ass stinko, you're dripping
crisco.


--
"You trying to work me, boy?" - Minerva,
Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
"It's A Business, Stupid". The Bogus Prophet
The Bogus Prophet...@netcom.com Copyright 2000, Mike Palij

The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
The Infamous Stone Golem <stone...@aol.commence> wrote:
>Tehawk wrote in message ...
>>On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and
>>millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
>><St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>>
>>>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>>>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>>>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>>>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>>>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>>
>>>
>>>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>>>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>>>
>>
>>In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
>>by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.
>>Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
>>story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
>>including myself.
>>Now you are gasping at straws.
>
>But you're a stupid spic Chico.

Gee, I wonder what the NYU will do when they see your posting pattern
on Usenet? The Hispanic and African-American student organizations
will be *very* interested, m'kay?

>--Stone

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
Robert Gibson's Glass Eye wrote:
>
> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
> news:3906D3...@erols.com...

> > This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> > blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> > intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> > That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> > HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>
> Not only that, he HASN'T POSTED, YOU MARK.

Yada yada yada. JH's "buddy" indeed.


> As for your allegation that I
> haven't posted on-topic, I'm showing 4 On-Topic posts between the 23rd and
> 25th, inclusive.

Compared to how many off-topic/inflammatory ones?


> How many have YOU made?

We're not talking about MY posting pattern, but I figured you'd try to
dodge the issue with this. I've been accused of being the sole reason
you don't post on topic, and your pattern has shown this not to be true.


> > Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> > Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>

> You wish, sphincter boy.

Sure John.


> > [insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
>

> [inserted by proxy]


>
> > Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
>

> I'm not blaming you for anyone's behavior but your own, you hypocritical
> self-righteous prick. It sucks, you suck, period. Also, your erroneous
> identification notwithstanding, I've posted on-topic this week, including
> long rants on what workers read/post here and what things WCW could do to
> maintain/elevate interest. THOSE get no responses, from you or from most of
> the other people that like to whine and bitch about how bad the other guy
> is. Since I tend to read responses to my own articles first, what gets
> responded to is what I reply to.

So what you're saying is, unless you post off-topic, nobody pays
attention to you, right?


> No go crawl back in your hole, you whining bitch. You're worse than
> useless. Or don't, if you're the type that gets off on making a complete
> fool of yourself.

No foolishness on my end...I'm just pointing out the obvious.


> Oh, wait.
>
> Nevermind.
>
> You want something to scrutinize, I invite you to closely scrutinize my ass
> hairs. You will have plenty of opportunity, with your nose buried up there
> the way it is.

Here we go with the gay suggestions again...I'm starting to notice a
pattern with you. Have you come out of the closet, Johnny Boy?!


> And I still ain't Dejong.

Heh. Misspelling your name for camoflauge?


> I just think he's worth emulating, in most
> aspects.

HAHAHA! That's good enough for me!!!

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
The Bogus Prophet wrote:

>
> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> >blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> >intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> >That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> >HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
> >
> >Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> >Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
> >
> >[insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
> >
> >Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
>
> *yawn* Whine, whine, whine. Go wipe your ass stinko, you're dripping
> crisco.

That's right, Palij--toss insults instead of acknowledging the point I
made. I figured as much.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
Tehawk wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and
> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>
> >This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> >blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> >intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> >That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> >HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>
> >
> >Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> >Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
> >
>
> In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
> by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.

Very true, but I'm not blamed for THEIR bad habits, just JH's.


> Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
> story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
> including myself.

It's not that hard to understand--I was accused of being the bad
influence on JH, not on you.

The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
>The Bogus Prophet wrote:
>>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
>>>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>>>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>>>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>>>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>>>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>>>
>>>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>>>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>>>
>>>[insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
>>>
>>>Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
>>
>> *yawn* Whine, whine, whine. Go wipe your ass stinko, you're dripping
>> crisco.
>
>That's right, Palij--toss insults instead of acknowledging the point I
>made. I figured as much.

I did acknowledge the point you were making. To me, your point
is like crisco dripping out of your ass. :-)

DChance

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
Shut up.


The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to

The Bogus Prophet wrote in message <8e735m$o56$1...@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>...

>The Infamous Stone Golem <stone...@aol.commence> wrote:
>>Tehawk wrote in message ...
>>>On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and
>>>millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
>>><St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>>>
>>>>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>>>>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>>>>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>>>>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>>>>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>>>>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>>>>
>>>
>>>In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
>>>by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.
>>>Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
>>>story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
>>>including myself.
>>>Now you are gasping at straws.
>>
>>But you're a stupid spic Chico.
>
>Gee, I wonder what the NYU will do when they see your posting pattern
>on Usenet? The Hispanic and African-American student organizations
>will be *very* interested, m'kay?
>

Much like the Justice Department will be interested in yours pedophile. You
could lose that web site of yours.

John Proulx

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
"The Bogus Sting" <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
news:3906D3...@erols.com...

> This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>

Just for the record...

I never blamed you for anyone else's behavior. That would be idiotic. Maybe
you don't remember that the first person I torched when I came 'round here
WAS Mr. DeJong. Much like Mr. Bryant, he takes full credit for his own bad
behavior -- although that doesn't always stop either of them from continuing
such behavior.

On the other hand, I DO blame you for:

1) Not contributing to wrestling discussion on a wrestling newsgroup,
2) Carrying on lengthy, meaningless discussions with certain posters that
are basically verbose versions of "Did Not!" -- "Did Too!"
3) Hiding behind a false name
4) Kicking people when they're down
5) Using your intelligence to assault people rather than actually trying to
convince them you're right (even when you ARE right)
6) Generally being an arrogant S.O.B.

But no, I don't blame you for Mr. DeJong's behavior. Everyone's pretty much
responsible for their own behavior -- including you.

> Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>

And I should care why?

> Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.

Think about ANYTHING before throwing accusations against people.

John Proulx


The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
John Proulx wrote:
>
> "The Bogus Sting" <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
> news:3906D3...@erols.com...
> > This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> > blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> > intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> > That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> > HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
> >
>
> Just for the record...
>
> I never blamed you for anyone else's behavior. That would be idiotic. Maybe
> you don't remember that the first person I torched when I came 'round here
> WAS Mr. DeJong. Much like Mr. Bryant, he takes full credit for his own bad
> behavior

I beg to differ with you here--I don't feel like trudging through Deja
right now, but he most certainly has blamed me for not posting on-topic.


> -- although that doesn't always stop either of them from continuing
> such behavior.

How true.


> On the other hand, I DO blame you for:
>
> 1) Not contributing to wrestling discussion on a wrestling newsgroup,
> 2) Carrying on lengthy, meaningless discussions with certain posters that
> are basically verbose versions of "Did Not!" -- "Did Too!"
> 3) Hiding behind a false name
> 4) Kicking people when they're down
> 5) Using your intelligence to assault people rather than actually trying to
> convince them you're right (even when you ARE right)
> 6) Generally being an arrogant S.O.B.

I'd agree to everything except #6. The people I've had major conflicts
with have been the arrogant ones, and any perception of a condescending
attitude on my part has only been trying to show my detractors how
they're NOT as great as they might have you believe. Granted, this
might be easily mistaken for arrogance, but it's not the case.


> But no, I don't blame you for Mr. DeJong's behavior. Everyone's pretty much
> responsible for their own behavior -- including you.

Except I differ from JH in that I don't blame anybody else for my
conduct.


> > Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> > Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
> >
>
> And I should care why?

This wasn't some grand exposé...I just was pointing out that even when
left to his own devices, he's still an arrogant ass who is more
interested in being belligerent than anything else.


> > Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
>
> Think about ANYTHING before throwing accusations against people.

Amen.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
The Bogus Prophet wrote:
>
> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >The Bogus Prophet wrote:

> >>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >>>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> >>>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> >>>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> >>>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> >>>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
> >>>
> >>>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> >>>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
> >>>
> >>>[insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
> >>>
> >>>Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
> >>
> >> *yawn* Whine, whine, whine. Go wipe your ass stinko, you're dripping
> >> crisco.
> >
> >That's right, Palij--toss insults instead of acknowledging the point I
> >made. I figured as much.
>
> I did acknowledge the point you were making. To me, your point
> is like crisco dripping out of your ass. :-)

Another anal fixation of yours. Hmmmm.

John Proulx

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
"The Bogus Sting" <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
news:390753...@erols.com...
> John Proulx wrote:
> >
> > "The Bogus Sting" <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
> > news:3906D3...@erols.com...

> > > This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those
who
> > > blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> > > intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> > > That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael.
He
> > > HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
> > >
> >
> > Just for the record...
> >
> > I never blamed you for anyone else's behavior. That would be idiotic.
Maybe
> > you don't remember that the first person I torched when I came 'round
here
> > WAS Mr. DeJong. Much like Mr. Bryant, he takes full credit for his own
bad
> > behavior
>
> I beg to differ with you here--I don't feel like trudging through Deja
> right now, but he most certainly has blamed me for not posting on-topic.
>

Hmmm...might have been in something I didn't read. Over time, I tend to tune
out your threads after about 70-80 posts :) .

<snip>


>
> > On the other hand, I DO blame you for:
> >
> > 1) Not contributing to wrestling discussion on a wrestling newsgroup,
> > 2) Carrying on lengthy, meaningless discussions with certain posters
that
> > are basically verbose versions of "Did Not!" -- "Did Too!"
> > 3) Hiding behind a false name
> > 4) Kicking people when they're down
> > 5) Using your intelligence to assault people rather than actually trying
to
> > convince them you're right (even when you ARE right)
> > 6) Generally being an arrogant S.O.B.
>
> I'd agree to everything except #6. The people I've had major conflicts
> with have been the arrogant ones, and any perception of a condescending
> attitude on my part has only been trying to show my detractors how
> they're NOT as great as they might have you believe. Granted, this
> might be easily mistaken for arrogance, but it's not the case.
>

*shrug* Could've fooled me. Still, I grant you that the folks you engage in
verbal combat are just as, if not more, arrogant as you are. Still, every
post in those threads proves me half-right -- doing things in that manner
isn't the answer. I still think the opposite would be the answer, but there
are just too many abrasive people here to ever think that there will be
decorum in the foreseeable future.

Our loss.

John Proulx


The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
In article <sgek1m...@corp.supernews.com>,
The Infamous Stone Golem <stone...@aol.commence> wrote:
>The Bogus Prophet wrote in message <8e735m$o56$1...@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>...

>>Gee, I wonder what the NYU will do when they see your posting pattern
>>on Usenet? The Hispanic and African-American student organizations
>>will be *very* interested, m'kay?
>>
>
>Much like the Justice Department will be interested in yours pedophile. You
>could lose that web site of yours.

God, you are *so* stupid Mr. Signorelli. The only person the Justice
Department will be interested in is *you*, and for obvious reasons.

>--Stone

The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
>The Bogus Prophet wrote:
>>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
>>>The Bogus Prophet wrote:

>>>>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
>>>>>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>>>>>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>>>>>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>>>>>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>>>>>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>>>>>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>>>>>
>>>>>[insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
>>>>>
>>>>>Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
>>>>
>>>> *yawn* Whine, whine, whine. Go wipe your ass stinko, you're dripping
>>>> crisco.
>>>
>>>That's right, Palij--toss insults instead of acknowledging the point I
>>>made. I figured as much.
>>
>> I did acknowledge the point you were making. To me, your point
>> is like crisco dripping out of your ass. :-)
>
>Another anal fixation of yours. Hmmmm.

"Anal fixation"? Stinko, *you're* the one dripping crisco. I just call
them as I see them. :-)

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
The Bogus Prophet wrote:
>
> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >The Bogus Prophet wrote:
> >>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >>>The Bogus Prophet wrote:
> >>>>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >>>>>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> >>>>>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> >>>>>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> >>>>>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> >>>>>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> >>>>>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>[insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
> >>>>
> >>>> *yawn* Whine, whine, whine. Go wipe your ass stinko, you're dripping
> >>>> crisco.
> >>>
> >>>That's right, Palij--toss insults instead of acknowledging the point I
> >>>made. I figured as much.
> >>
> >> I did acknowledge the point you were making. To me, your point
> >> is like crisco dripping out of your ass. :-)
> >
> >Another anal fixation of yours. Hmmmm.
>
> "Anal fixation"? Stinko, *you're* the one dripping crisco. I just call
> them as I see them. :-)

So you visualize men's anuses with shortening coming out, when all
anybody else sees is a bunch of words typed on a computer screen. Very
interesting fantasy you have.

The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to

Actually, I didn't visualize anything, but thanks for sharing your
mental imagery with us. I was using a verbal metaphor to identify
what the content of your post was most like.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to

Nice backpedal.

The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to

Tell me something, stinko. Why is it that when I layeth the smacketh
downeth royally on you, you always say "nice backpedal"? I mean, can't
you come up with anything more original or creative? Don't hurt yourself
in the process.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to

You conjure up all this asshole/Crisco stuff, then when confronted about
it you try to weasel your way out of owning up to it. And as usual, I'm
just pointing out the obvious. Also as usual, you've said nothing
whatsoever that inspires me to reply with anything creative. Does that
answer your question?

The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to

What can I say, stinko? The stuff you write seems like crisco, and I
don't mean like in cooking. Can I help it if *your* writing style is
thusly suggestive?

>And as usual, I'm just pointing out the obvious.

Ever see the movie Barfly? Remember what the Bukowski character
said to Faye Dunaway about the bartender? "You're so obvious", stinko.

>Also as usual, you've said nothing whatsoever that inspires me to
reply with anything creative. Does that answer your question?

Well, it just confirms to me that you couldn't be creative even if
you were threatened with a molten lead enema to be creative. *shrug*

Ooops! Another anus reference! I wonder if this means your writing
makes me think that you're just an asshole? Hmmmmm...

Tehawk

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:35:14 -0400, another one of the millions and

millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
<St...@erols.com> shouted out:

>Tehawk wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and
>> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
>> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>>

>> >This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>> >blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>> >intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>> >That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>> >HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>>
>> >
>> >Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>> >Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>> >
>>

>> In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
>> by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.
>

>Very true, but I'm not blamed for THEIR bad habits, just JH's.
>

And who do you blame for yours?


>
>> Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
>> story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
>> including myself.
>

>It's not that hard to understand--I was accused of being the bad
>influence on JH, not on you.

Funny I never saw anyone accuse you of being an influence on Dejong.
If anything he's been an influence on you.
BTW, I've never claimed that anyone influenced me in anyway in this
place, unlike your pet drone who claims he doesn't like me posting in
your threads.

Tehawk

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:37:01 -0400, another one of the millions and

millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
<St...@erols.com> shouted out:

>John Proulx wrote:
>>
>> "The Bogus Sting" <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
>> news:3906D3...@erols.com...


>> > This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>> > blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>> > intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>> > That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>> > HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>> >
>>

>> Just for the record...
>>
>> I never blamed you for anyone else's behavior. That would be idiotic. Maybe
>> you don't remember that the first person I torched when I came 'round here
>> WAS Mr. DeJong. Much like Mr. Bryant, he takes full credit for his own bad
>> behavior
>
>I beg to differ with you here--I don't feel like trudging through Deja
>right now, but he most certainly has blamed me for not posting on-topic.
>
>

>> -- although that doesn't always stop either of them from continuing
>> such behavior.
>
>How true.
>
>

>> On the other hand, I DO blame you for:
>>
>> 1) Not contributing to wrestling discussion on a wrestling newsgroup,
>> 2) Carrying on lengthy, meaningless discussions with certain posters that
>> are basically verbose versions of "Did Not!" -- "Did Too!"
>> 3) Hiding behind a false name
>> 4) Kicking people when they're down
>> 5) Using your intelligence to assault people rather than actually trying to
>> convince them you're right (even when you ARE right)
>> 6) Generally being an arrogant S.O.B.
>
>I'd agree to everything except #6. The people I've had major conflicts
>with have been the arrogant ones, and any perception of a condescending
>attitude on my part has only been trying to show my detractors how
>they're NOT as great as they might have you believe. Granted, this
>might be easily mistaken for arrogance, but it's not the case.
>

Actually with part of number 6, I don't know if you're an SOB but you
are one of the most arrogant people in here.
It's a trait you share with Dejong. The two of you also act like you
think you;'re superior to everyone else in here.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
Tehawk wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:35:14 -0400, another one of the millions and

> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>
> >Tehawk wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and

> >> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
> >> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
> >>
> >> >This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> >> >blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> >> >intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> >> >That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> >> >HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> >> >Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
> >> >
> >>
> >> In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
> >> by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.
> >
> >Very true, but I'm not blamed for THEIR bad habits, just JH's.
> >
>
> And who do you blame for yours?

Nobody but myself. Is there a point you're trying to make?


> >
> >> Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
> >> story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
> >> including myself.
> >
> >It's not that hard to understand--I was accused of being the bad
> >influence on JH, not on you.
>
> Funny I never saw anyone accuse you of being an influence on Dejong.

But don't let that stop you from interjecting your opinion on the
matter. Sheesh!


> If anything he's been an influence on you.
> BTW, I've never claimed that anyone influenced me in anyway in this
> place, unlike your pet drone who claims he doesn't like me posting in
> your threads.

Okay, enlighten me...who (nN) is my "pet drone" ???

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to
The Bogus Prophet wrote:
>
> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >The Bogus Prophet wrote:
> >>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >>>The Bogus Prophet wrote:
> >>>>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >>>>>The Bogus Prophet wrote:
> >>>>>>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>The Bogus Prophet wrote:
> >>>>>>>>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>The Bogus Prophet wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> >>>>>>>>>>>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> >>>>>>>>>>>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> >>>>>>>>>>>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> >>>>>>>>>>>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> >>>>>>>>>>>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
> >>>>>>>>>>>

Let's watch Palij do the moonwalk!


> >And as usual, I'm just pointing out the obvious.
>
> Ever see the movie Barfly? Remember what the Bukowski character
> said to Faye Dunaway about the bartender? "You're so obvious", stinko.

Sorry, I don't remember the scene.


> >Also as usual, you've said nothing whatsoever that inspires me to
> reply with anything creative. Does that answer your question?
>
> Well, it just confirms to me that you couldn't be creative even if
> you were threatened with a molten lead enema to be creative. *shrug*

Enemas, butts, asses, Crisco...Palij, I can't help it if your anal
fetish isn't exactly inspiring to me.


> Ooops! Another anus reference!

Precisely! Trying to beat me to the punch?


> I wonder if this means your writing
> makes me think that you're just an asshole? Hmmmmm...

No, I'm wondering how long I can keep you on my leash.

The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to

Tehawk wrote in message ...
>
>Actually with part of number 6, I don't know if you're an SOB but you
>are one of the most arrogant people in here.
>It's a trait you share with Dejong. The two of you also act like you
>think you;'re superior to everyone else in here.
>


Dejong is superior to you Chico. And that really puts you at the bottom of
the food chain.

The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
Apr 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/26/00
to

The Bogus Sting wrote in message <390753...@erols.com>...

>The Bogus Prophet wrote:
>>
>> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
>> >The Bogus Prophet wrote:
>> >>The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote:
>> >>>This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those
who
>> >>>blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>> >>>intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>> >>>That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael.
He
>> >>>HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>> >>>
>> >>>Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the
name
>> >>>Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>> >>>
>> >>>[insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
>> >>>
>> >>>Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
>> >>
>> >> *yawn* Whine, whine, whine. Go wipe your ass stinko, you're dripping
>> >> crisco.
>> >
>> >That's right, Palij--toss insults instead of acknowledging the point I
>> >made. I figured as much.
>>
>> I did acknowledge the point you were making. To me, your point
>> is like crisco dripping out of your ass. :-)
>
>Another anal fixation of yours. Hmmmm.

No wonder everybody calls him a pedophile.

The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
>>>>>>>> "Anal fixation"? Stinko, *you're* the one dripping crisco. I just call
>>>>>>>> them as I see them. :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So you visualize men's anuses with shortening coming out, when all
>>>>>>>anybody else sees is a bunch of words typed on a computer screen. Very
>>>>>>>interesting fantasy you have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, I didn't visualize anything, but thanks for sharing your
>>>>>> mental imagery with us. I was using a verbal metaphor to identify
>>>>>> what the content of your post was most like.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nice backpedal.
>>>>
>>>> Tell me something, stinko. Why is it that when I layeth the smacketh
>>>> downeth royally on you, you always say "nice backpedal"? I mean, can't
>>>> you come up with anything more original or creative? Don't hurt yourself
>>>> in the process.
>>>
>>>You conjure up all this asshole/Crisco stuff, then when confronted about
>>>it you try to weasel your way out of owning up to it.
>>
>> What can I say, stinko? The stuff you write seems like crisco, and I
>> don't mean like in cooking. Can I help it if *your* writing style is
>> thusly suggestive?
>
>Let's watch Palij do the moonwalk!

And guess what? I can also chew gum at the same time. Once again
I'm able to outperform you.


>>>And as usual, I'm just pointing out the obvious.
>>
>> Ever see the movie Barfly? Remember what the Bukowski character
>> said to Faye Dunaway about the bartender? "You're so obvious", stinko.
>
>Sorry, I don't remember the scene.

I'm not surprised. It's amazing that you can remember anything.


>>>Also as usual, you've said nothing whatsoever that inspires me to
>> reply with anything creative. Does that answer your question?
>>
>> Well, it just confirms to me that you couldn't be creative even if
>> you were threatened with a molten lead enema to be creative. *shrug*
>
>Enemas, butts, asses, Crisco...Palij, I can't help it if your anal
>fetish isn't exactly inspiring to me.

*shrug* You and your buttbuddy fluxie not get along these days?


>> Ooops! Another anus reference!
>
>Precisely! Trying to beat me to the punch?

Actually, you're so predictable that there's no point in trying
to beat you to the punch. Makes more sense just to beat you.


>> I wonder if this means your writing
>> makes me think that you're just an asshole? Hmmmmm...
>
>No, I'm wondering how long I can keep you on my leash.

Would you do me a favor stinko? Would you wrap that lease around
your neck? Pretty please? :-)

John Dejong, the NetBastard

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
In article <sgdudl...@corp.supernews.com>,
"Robert Gibson's Glass Eye" <igotn...@perception.com> wrote:
> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
> news:3906D3...@erols.com...

> > This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those
who
> > blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that
I've
> > intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he
done?
> > That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz
Michael. He
> > HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>
> Not only that, he HASN'T POSTED, YOU MARK. As for your allegation

that I
> haven't posted on-topic, I'm showing 4 On-Topic posts between the
23rd and
> 25th, inclusive.
>
> How many have YOU made?
>
> > Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the
name
> > Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>
> You wish, sphincter boy.

>
> > [insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
>
> [inserted by proxy]

>
> > Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
>
> I'm not blaming you for anyone's behavior but your own, you
hypocritical
> self-righteous prick. It sucks, you suck, period. Also, your
erroneous
> identification notwithstanding, I've posted on-topic this week,
including
> long rants on what workers read/post here and what things WCW could
do to
> maintain/elevate interest. THOSE get no responses, from you or from
most of
> the other people that like to whine and bitch about how bad the other
guy
> is. Since I tend to read responses to my own articles first, what
gets
> responded to is what I reply to.
>
> No go crawl back in your hole, you whining bitch. You're worse than
> useless. Or don't, if you're the type that gets off on making a
complete
> fool of yourself.
>
> Oh, wait.
>
> Nevermind.
>
> You want something to scrutinize, I invite you to closely scrutinize
my ass
> hairs. You will have plenty of opportunity, with your nose buried up
there
> the way it is.
>
> And I still ain't Dejong. I just think he's worth emulating, in most
> aspects.
>
>


Hi John.

--
"I fear child support"-John Dejong


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Tehawk

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:16:09 -0400, another one of the millions and

millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
<St...@erols.com> shouted out:

>Tehawk wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:35:14 -0400, another one of the millions and
>> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
>> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>>
>> >Tehawk wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and
>> >> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
>> >> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>> >>

>> >> >This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>> >> >blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>> >> >intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>> >> >That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>> >> >HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>> >>
>> >> >

>> >> >Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>> >> >Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>> >> >
>> >>

>> >> In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
>> >> by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.
>> >
>> >Very true, but I'm not blamed for THEIR bad habits, just JH's.
>> >
>>
>> And who do you blame for yours?
>
>Nobody but myself. Is there a point you're trying to make?
>
>
>> >
>> >> Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
>> >> story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
>> >> including myself.
>> >
>> >It's not that hard to understand--I was accused of being the bad
>> >influence on JH, not on you.
>>
>> Funny I never saw anyone accuse you of being an influence on Dejong.
>
>But don't let that stop you from interjecting your opinion on the
>matter. Sheesh!
>

You're always injecting yourself in threads that don't involve you in
the first place, as long as your favorite people are already in it.
You're the last person that can complain if anyone else does it.


>
>> If anything he's been an influence on you.
>> BTW, I've never claimed that anyone influenced me in anyway in this
>> place, unlike your pet drone who claims he doesn't like me posting in
>> your threads.
>
>Okay, enlighten me...who (nN) is my "pet drone" ???

Look elsewhere in this thread. He's some dope that started following
me around because he claims he got upset that I "dared" to interject
myself in one of your posts.
Here's a clue, he's doing teh same thing you're accusing Dejong of
doing, except that he's copying the name of another poster.

Tehawk

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
On 27 Apr 2000 00:31:38 GMT, another one of the millions and millions
of the Hawk's fans, the person known as bok...@netcom.com (The Bogus
Prophet) shouted out:


>>Let's watch Palij do the moonwalk!
>
>And guess what? I can also chew gum at the same time. Once again
>I'm able to outperform you.
>

Can you do the worm too?

Tehawk

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 13:15:40 -0500, another one of the millions and
millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as "DChance"
<DChance@cox-internet-com> shouted out:

>Shut up.
>
>

You're posting from supernews and using IE 5. According to Stinker
and Cain, that means you're John Dejong.

The Bogus Prophet

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
Tehawk <teh...@att.net> wrote:
>On 27 Apr 2000 00:31:38 GMT, another one of the millions and millions
>of the Hawk's fans, the person known as bok...@netcom.com (The Bogus
>Prophet) shouted out:
>
>>>Let's watch Palij do the moonwalk!
>>
>>And guess what? I can also chew gum at the same time. Once again
>>I'm able to outperform you.
>
>Can you do the worm too?

Only for people of the female persuasion. I expect them to be
able to eat the worm afterwards. :-)



>Tehawk ©2000
>RSPWWCW European Champion
>Former Two Time RSPWWCW World Champion
>Former RSPWECW World Champion
>Former RSPWECW Softcore Champion

Robert Gibson's Glass Eye

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
news:390719...@erols.com...
> Yada yada yada. JH's "buddy" indeed.

Not sure anyone is claiming this but you.

> > How many have YOU made?

> We're not talking about MY posting pattern,

Of course not. That would require that you spend a little time being
accountable for your actions, which we all know you are incapable of doing.

> So what you're saying is, unless you post off-topic, nobody pays
> attention to you, right?

No, what I'm saying is, in the case of the last several days, there have
been more responses to my off-topic posts than to on-topic, and therefore
that is what I've spent the most time replying to.

> Here we go with the gay suggestions again...I'm starting to notice a
> pattern with you. Have you come out of the closet, Johnny Boy?!

Nothing gay about you having your nose up my ass, just rude.

> > I just think he's worth emulating, in most
> > aspects.

> HAHAHA! That's good enough for me!!!

If only this were true.

Robert Gibson's Glass Eye

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
news:390753...@erols.com...

> > 6) Generally being an arrogant S.O.B.

> I'd agree to everything except #6. The people I've had major conflicts
> with have been the arrogant ones, and any perception of a condescending
> attitude on my part has only been trying to show my detractors how
> they're NOT as great as they might have you believe. Granted, this
> might be easily mistaken for arrogance, but it's not the case.

Funny, isn't it, that when Dejong used this reasoning you torched him.

> Except I differ from JH in that I don't blame anybody else for my
> conduct.

Hm. I'd like to see where ol' JH ever 'blamed' you for his 'conduct.' More
like 'hey, you talk about me, I talk back, STFU about me and we won't be
having these discussions.' Which you waffled out of by claiming youhadn't,
even after having it proven beyond any reasonable doubt that what he said
(that you continued flaming him when he wasn't around) was accurate and what
you said ("I never flamed you when you weren't here" and yeah, you DID use
the absolute) was not.

Now really, don't you have something better to do than obsess about a guy
that's not even here anymore?

Yeah, it's me

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
</lurk>
I'm gonna try to hit everything in one post, since I have no desire to make
a 'return' or whatever. There's some wrestling stuff below, and of course
the rest of it, too.

How funny is it that the only thing necessary to get a thread 50 miles long
is to mention my name? And how funny that all you have to do to be accused
of being me is have a supernews feed, IE5, and a reasonably decent command
of the english language?

And hey, bob - it's "DeJong." Capital J.

That said, off I go, again. I just had to pop in here and laugh my ass off
at Stinko. Chad told me about this guy and stink seeing me everywhere he
turns, and I had to come back and gloat a bit over all of it, being the
net.bastard that I am. I think it's hilarious. This cat's pulling your
strings like a marionnette, sparky.

And for whoever cares, the court situation seems to have turned out for the
positive. I'm obviously not dead, I thank everyone that e-mailed for their
positive energy. I've decided that as much as I sometimes wish I was, I'm
just not the suicidal type. Melodramatic, over-emotional, and
manic-depressive, yes, but not suicidal. Sorry to disappoint anyone.
(<--Sarcasm). Thank you again to all the well-wishers who e-mailed me with
their good will and in some cases, offers of assistance.

Nice to see everyone. Especially Pete, who, in my absence, seems to have
wholly given himself over to his intense desire to be me. I'm flattered.

You can still find me on #rspwchat, and my new e-mail addy is in the header
of this message.

OBWrestling: New WCW, thumbs up, generally. Some rough spots, but I have
confidence that they'll get thing turned around, in time. WWF, been looking
good, although a tad on the 'same old same old' side. But overall, I think
it's a good time to be a wrestling fan.

Of course, no post from me would be complete without mentioning the
OmegaPowers, so, huge props to Matt Hardy on the HC title win, congrats to
the Dupps on devcon with Titan, and hey, WCW, how about seeing more of
Helms, Moore, Frog, Rave? Hey, ECW, are we gonna see Matthews and York
anytime soon? And big props to CW Anderson and former SCW/Omega/WWO wrestler
Chilly Willy, also to Steve "Yeah baby I get mad heat" Corino. Somebody put
Cham Pain back in a ring, and for crying out *loud*, HIRE LEXIE FYFE. And
WCW should track down and sign Willow the Wisp, just to prove once and for
all that he's not Jeff Hardy. Ted Hobgood, you jabrone, thanks for the
nihongo and all the other help. Hope you like what I've done with it.

We are all stars in the Black Tunaverse.

Redesigning the op site, check it out at http://omegapowers.tripod.com and
let me know whatcha think. New graphics, new layout, etc etc. Done so far
are pages for Joey Abs, CW Anderson, Bo Dupp, Links, and Legal. I've got
some new pics (well, old pics that you haven't seen yet) to scan in, and
other stuff. The rest will get done as I get time and information to do
them with. Also, obviously, I have my own domain now, but I've not redone
much on that site, just a new splash page and an mp3 list at
http://www.net-bastard.com That site will likely include a semi-regular
rant/column from me at some point in the near future.

I want to put over some people from SCW real quick that I haven't mentioned
nearly enough: Natrone Steele and Scab, who you can see on last year's
Break the Barrier tape, are really coming along nicely. Major DeBeers is,
as always, the consummate professional and has probably forgotten more about
being in the ring than most people ever learn. Krome (formerly Juice) is
progressing nicely, and has really stepped up in the loss of several major
talents. Stratus bears watching, very good. Dewey Cheatum is a great
worker, but may face problems because of his size, which is unfortunate.
Pat Cusick has developed amazingly. There's a kid called the 'Saltwater
Redneck' that I think has a lot of potential, as well. Will Powers, another
great guy and incredible worker who, like Dewey, I believe will overcome his
size in time. Uncle Tom Kettle is another guy I haven't put over nearly
enough, a very talented comedy/hardcore worker. Rick Link, is fucking
insane. He's been around for a long time, and he's not a technical wizard
by any stretch of the imagination - you're not going to see a lot of
swantons and planchas from him, but you will see insanity and gallons of
blood. Big props to new writer James Thurston III as well. Aldo DeGama is
looking real good, as is King. Big Slam, as always, knows how to work a
crowd. Check www.scwprowrestling.com for more SCW information including
ranking and upcoming shows.

Anyone wants to e-mail me, it's netba...@net-bastard.com The
wrestlingfanz.com address still works as well. Mattie, I'll get hold of you
very soon, hopefully tomorrow. Bokonon, still haven't heard anything.
There's a ton of people here I want to give props to, but I'm afraid I'll
leave someone out....FunkyM, Alex Cain is the COTSE troll that's been giving
you heat and impersonating you, and we all know what his opinions are worth.
Satyr, a continued great job with the binary group. Edge Marks, check out
http://redrival.com/edge32 she runs a great site. All you people that have
had intelligent and well-reasoned comments about wrestling, thanks to you,
rest assured that people ARE listening. Alien Gonzales should be sent home
with his dad, but I could really give a shit about him. Allen J. Benson,
your wisdom and self-control are a hallmark for intelligent posting. If we
were all like you, I'd probably come back full time. Harper Murren, stop by
#rspwchat sometime, man. Glenn Joos, e-mail me, bro, I haven't heard from
you in a long time. Same to everyone else that wants to drop a line, for
whatever reason. Drop a line, or stop by the OmegaPowers site, the feedback
page is set up, you can send a message to me there as well, and I'll also be
putting a similar form up at my domain. As always, I don't make any money
off of any of that stuff, so don't worry about shilling or whatever.

And I think that's it. I'll lurk back occasionally, but it's usually only
when Chad tells me about some shit like Gancarski lying his pussy,
child-molesting ass off about having met me or 'inviting' me to his place to
'discuss' things. Rest assured, you fat, worthless piece of shit, if you
ever met me face to face and had the balls to identify yourself, you
wouldn't be able to brag about it here. Stink, you idiot, you played right
into this Gibson dude's hands. Panaro, Cain, Avenger - get fucking *lives*
already. Jesus, you're sad, and each and every one of youhas an open
invitation from me to drop on by an SCW show, IDENTIFY YOURSELF TO ME - just
ask around, people know who I am - and we shall settle our differences
decisively. Until then, you remain as you have always been - lifeless,
worthless losers taking jealous potshots at your superiors from behind the
safety screen of distance and in some cases anonymity. Tehawk, Proo, and
others - I realize that you never understood this, and probably never will,
and I'm not faulting you for it, but I do not now, nor have I ever, thought
I was 'better than everyone else.' Only a few select idiots. My
self-appointed enemies, eef you weel (my enemies are always self-appointed).
The vast majority of the newsgroup, I have never felt that I was 'better
than.' Sorry to hear that you see things otherwise. I guess my ability to
make people buy into the whole 'character' was better than I thought, but I
really figured most people would have the perception to realize that my
arrogant demeanor was bullshit. I'm easily one of the least self-assured
people I know - the only things I'm certain that I am better than average at
are sex, playing the drums, and running my mouth. That's as straight a
shoot as there can be.

I wish you all well. I might pop back in from time to time to shill
something or whatever, let y'all know what's going on with me if I get back
in the biz or whatever. Take care, everyone.

And word to Robert Gibson's Glass Eye: I'm flattered, but trying to make
sense to a guy like Stink is a waste of time. He has none.

To everyone who's e-mails I haven't answered, my heartiest apologies, I've
been totally wrapped up in some stuff lately. If you don't hear from me by
the end of this weekend, drop me a line and kick my ass.

Peace.
<lurk>


Robert Gibson's Glass Eye <igotn...@perception.com> wrote in message
news:sgdudl...@corp.supernews.com...


> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote in message

> news:3906D3...@erols.com...


> > This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> > blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> > intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> > That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> > HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>

> Not only that, he HASN'T POSTED, YOU MARK. As for your allegation that I
> haven't posted on-topic, I'm showing 4 On-Topic posts between the 23rd and
> 25th, inclusive.
>

> How many have YOU made?
>

> > Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> > Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>

> You wish, sphincter boy.
>
> > [insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
>
> [inserted by proxy]
>
> > Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
>
> I'm not blaming you for anyone's behavior but your own, you hypocritical
> self-righteous prick. It sucks, you suck, period. Also, your erroneous
> identification notwithstanding, I've posted on-topic this week, including
> long rants on what workers read/post here and what things WCW could do to
> maintain/elevate interest. THOSE get no responses, from you or from most
of
> the other people that like to whine and bitch about how bad the other guy
> is. Since I tend to read responses to my own articles first, what gets
> responded to is what I reply to.
>
> No go crawl back in your hole, you whining bitch. You're worse than
> useless. Or don't, if you're the type that gets off on making a complete
> fool of yourself.
>
> Oh, wait.
>
> Nevermind.
>
> You want something to scrutinize, I invite you to closely scrutinize my
ass
> hairs. You will have plenty of opportunity, with your nose buried up
there
> the way it is.
>

> And I still ain't Dejong. I just think he's worth emulating, in most
> aspects.
>
>

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
Yeah, it's me wrote:
>
> [snip the whole post of the fake shoot/delurk]

Nice attempt to cover your new alias.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
Robert Gibson's Glass Eye wrote:
>
> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
> news:390753...@erols.com...
> > > 6) Generally being an arrogant S.O.B.
>
> > I'd agree to everything except #6. The people I've had major conflicts
> > with have been the arrogant ones, and any perception of a condescending
> > attitude on my part has only been trying to show my detractors how
> > they're NOT as great as they might have you believe. Granted, this
> > might be easily mistaken for arrogance, but it's not the case.
>
> Funny, isn't it, that when Dejong used this reasoning you torched him.

Yes I did. And it was because in his case it was all an attempt at
covering his tracks.


> > Except I differ from JH in that I don't blame anybody else for my
> > conduct.
>
> Hm. I'd like to see where ol' JH ever 'blamed' you for his 'conduct.' More
> like 'hey, you talk about me, I talk back, STFU about me and we won't be
> having these discussions.'

Nice try. I'm not in the mood for a Deja research project--do your own
homework. You told me you couldn't discuss wrestling with me around.


> Which you waffled out of by claiming youhadn't,
> even after having it proven beyond any reasonable doubt that what he said
> (that you continued flaming him when he wasn't around) was accurate and what
> you said ("I never flamed you when you weren't here" and yeah, you DID use
> the absolute) was not.

The crack is effecting your memory--put the pipe away.


> Now really, don't you have something better to do than obsess about a guy
> that's not even here anymore?

But you ARE here, you just don't have the stones to admit your cover is
blown.

Tell ya what--explain how:

1. you know excrutiating details of our flamewar beyond what a common
reader would know
2. you have very strong/insider opinions about drummers
3. you can't ignore me
4. you claim to be JH's "buddy" but then when he delurks calls you
"this guy" like he doesn't, ahem, know you.
5. you share a newsfeed & use the same newsreader, and headers are
identical
6. you claim you've been here for years but can't provide your past
posting ID's

That's just for starters.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
Tehawk wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:16:09 -0400, another one of the millions and
> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>
> >Tehawk wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:35:14 -0400, another one of the millions and

> >> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
> >> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
> >>
> >> >Tehawk wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and

> >> >> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
> >> >> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
> >> >>
> >> >> >This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
> >> >> >blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> >> >> >intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> >> >> >That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
> >> >> >HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
> >> >> >Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
> >> >> by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.
> >> >
> >> >Very true, but I'm not blamed for THEIR bad habits, just JH's.
> >> >
> >>
> >> And who do you blame for yours?
> >
> >Nobody but myself. Is there a point you're trying to make?
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> >> Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
> >> >> story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
> >> >> including myself.
> >> >
> >> >It's not that hard to understand--I was accused of being the bad
> >> >influence on JH, not on you.
> >>
> >> Funny I never saw anyone accuse you of being an influence on Dejong.
> >
> >But don't let that stop you from interjecting your opinion on the
> >matter. Sheesh!
> >
>
> You're always injecting yourself in threads that don't involve you in
> the first place, as long as your favorite people are already in it.
> You're the last person that can complain if anyone else does it.

Very much like Palij, rather than reply to the actual point, you go out
of your way to toss an insult/show that I'm a hypocrite of some sort.
Nice dodge.


> >
> >> If anything he's been an influence on you.
> >> BTW, I've never claimed that anyone influenced me in anyway in this
> >> place, unlike your pet drone who claims he doesn't like me posting in
> >> your threads.
> >
> >Okay, enlighten me...who (nN) is my "pet drone" ???
>
> Look elsewhere in this thread. He's some dope that started following
> me around because he claims he got upset that I "dared" to interject
> myself in one of your posts.
> Here's a clue, he's doing teh same thing you're accusing Dejong of
> doing, except that he's copying the name of another poster.

What does this have to do with me? This is really, really, thin.

Robert Gibson's Glass Eye

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
news:39081C...@erols.com...

> > Funny, isn't it, that when Dejong used this reasoning you torched him.

> Yes I did. And it was because in his case it was all an attempt at
> covering his tracks.

And your excuse is?

> Nice try. I'm not in the mood for a Deja research project--do your own
> homework. You told me you couldn't discuss wrestling with me around.

Right - you're too f'n lazy to back up your own BS.

> The crack is effecting your memory--put the pipe away.

Cute, but I've never touched the stuff.

> But you ARE here, you just don't have the stones to admit your cover is
> blown.

LOL

> Tell ya what--explain how:

Why should I explain anything?

> 1. you know excrutiating details of our flamewar beyond what a common
> reader would know

Because I've been here, in various incarnations, longer than either or you.

> 2. you have very strong/insider opinions about drummers

GASP. Uh....because I listen to a lot of music? I'd give you the real
answer, but then you're really piss your didies.

> 3. you can't ignore me

Oh, is THAT your game? All righty, then

> 4. you claim to be JH's "buddy" but then when he delurks calls you
> "this guy" like he doesn't, ahem, know you.

How TF should I know what he's thinking?

> 5. you share a newsfeed & use the same newsreader, and headers are
> identical

"Identical?" Maybe because we use the same newsfeed and newsreader?

> 6. you claim you've been here for years but can't provide your past
> posting ID's

I've used this one before, in fact.

> That's just for starters.

and this is for finishers:

You're a worthless cunt. You have nothing of value to say, and you're
clearly obsessed with Mr DeJong. Get a life, get a hobby, get a boyfriend,
get something, but get the hell outta my face already, you jackoff.

Oh, and in deference to #3:

byebye.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
Robert Gibson's Glass Eye wrote:
>
> The Bogus Sting <St...@erols.com> wrote in message
> news:39081C...@erols.com...
> > > Funny, isn't it, that when Dejong used this reasoning you torched him.
>
> > Yes I did. And it was because in his case it was all an attempt at
> > covering his tracks.
>
> And your excuse is?

You still don't get it do you? I'm the one who's opposing the whole
elitism faction here. Sometimes in the course of doing battle with
those idiots, it may look like I'm guilty of the same attitude. Aw
hell, you wouldn't understand it if I painted a friggin' picture.


> > Nice try. I'm not in the mood for a Deja research project--do your own
> > homework. You told me you couldn't discuss wrestling with me around.
>
> Right - you're too f'n lazy to back up your own BS.

No, it's just that you're just not worth my time.


> > The crack is effecting your memory--put the pipe away.
>
> Cute, but I've never touched the stuff.

Uh huh.


> > But you ARE here, you just don't have the stones to admit your cover is
> > blown.
>
> LOL
>
> > Tell ya what--explain how:
>
> Why should I explain anything?

You say this, yet you respond every time. Mark.


> > 1. you know excrutiating details of our flamewar beyond what a common
> > reader would know
>
> Because I've been here, in various incarnations, longer than either or you.

Yeah, as "John Henry", "JHNB", "John DeJong", and several others.


> > 2. you have very strong/insider opinions about drummers
>
> GASP. Uh....because I listen to a lot of music? I'd give you the real
> answer, but then you're really piss your didies.

Sure.


> > 3. you can't ignore me
>
> Oh, is THAT your game? All righty, then

Time for another screen name change!


> > 4. you claim to be JH's "buddy" but then when he delurks calls you
> > "this guy" like he doesn't, ahem, know you.
>
> How TF should I know what he's thinking?

He's the sock on the LEFT hand. Ask him.


> > 5. you share a newsfeed & use the same newsreader, and headers are
> > identical
>
> "Identical?" Maybe because we use the same newsfeed and newsreader?

Is there an echo in here!?


> > 6. you claim you've been here for years but can't provide your past
> > posting ID's
>
> I've used this one before, in fact.

You forgot to put *stutters* and *puts foot in mouth* up there.


> > That's just for starters.
>
> and this is for finishers:
>
> You're a worthless cunt. You have nothing of value to say, and you're
> clearly obsessed with Mr DeJong. Get a life, get a hobby, get a boyfriend,
> get something, but get the hell outta my face already, you jackoff.

So shut up about JH for a change, stay civil, and maybe I will.


> Oh, and in deference to #3:
>
> byebye.

*scratches another notch into computer desk* How many times have you
supposedly "PLONK"'ed me!?!

Tehawk

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 06:59:18 -0400, another one of the millions and

You make a remark that I inject myself in threads that don't involve
me. I point how that it's no different from what you do. I guess
that's too hard for you to understand.


>
>> >
>> >> If anything he's been an influence on you.
>> >> BTW, I've never claimed that anyone influenced me in anyway in this
>> >> place, unlike your pet drone who claims he doesn't like me posting in
>> >> your threads.
>> >
>> >Okay, enlighten me...who (nN) is my "pet drone" ???
>>
>> Look elsewhere in this thread. He's some dope that started following
>> me around because he claims he got upset that I "dared" to interject
>> myself in one of your posts.
>> Here's a clue, he's doing teh same thing you're accusing Dejong of
>> doing, except that he's copying the name of another poster.
>
>What does this have to do with me? This is really, really, thin.

He's claiming he's doing it on your behalf.
Do I have to draw a road map?

Tehawk ©2000
RSPWWCW European Champion
Former Two Time RSPWWCW World Champion
Former RSPWECW World Champion
Former RSPWECW Softcore Champion

The Franchise of RSPW

The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to

Tehawk wrote in message ...

You can't only write English Chico, you can't read it either. I never said I
was doing anything for Sting. Now back to your 7 Eleven job spic.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
Apr 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/27/00
to

Not at all. But what I have discovered is that you're making this into
a huge tangent instead of commenting on the point I made. Case closed.


> >
> >> >
> >> >> If anything he's been an influence on you.
> >> >> BTW, I've never claimed that anyone influenced me in anyway in this
> >> >> place, unlike your pet drone who claims he doesn't like me posting in
> >> >> your threads.
> >> >
> >> >Okay, enlighten me...who (nN) is my "pet drone" ???
> >>
> >> Look elsewhere in this thread. He's some dope that started following
> >> me around because he claims he got upset that I "dared" to interject
> >> myself in one of your posts.
> >> Here's a clue, he's doing teh same thing you're accusing Dejong of
> >> doing, except that he's copying the name of another poster.
> >
> >What does this have to do with me? This is really, really, thin.
>
> He's claiming he's doing it on your behalf.
> Do I have to draw a road map?

I had no idea. Nor do I care. Plus, he denies it.

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Apr 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/30/00
to
John's always going to have a boner for you, Sting.
If not you, then me. He seriously needs to take his own life
by eating lead.

In article <3906D3...@erols.com>,


St...@erols.com wrote:
> This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those
who
> blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
> intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
> That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael.
He
> HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>
> Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the
name
> Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>

> [insert the "prove I'm JH" rant]
>

> Think about this before you blame me for his behavior.
>

alex...@my-deja.com

unread,
Apr 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/30/00
to
John, I'm going to be nice, and finally reply to this. I originally told
myself I wouldn't, because alot of it was obvious troll bait, but since
you so cordially decided to bring up my name, DESPITE the fact that I
post about twice a month to RSPW now, DESPITE the fact that I haven't
posted about YOU in almost TWO months, and DESPITE the fact that I
really don't give two shits about you, yet your warped, twisted,
emotionally stunted mind simply HAS to blame me for all of your
problems...

in that respect, I shall answer.

And before I even begin: Fuck you.

In article <sgfrmt...@corp.supernews.com>,
"Yeah, it's me" <netba...@net-bastard.com> spat out:


> </lurk>
> I'm gonna try to hit everything in one post, since I have no desire to
make
> a 'return' or whatever.

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW! Oh, that's RICH!
I could bottle and sell that shit to farmers as compost!


There's some wrestling stuff below, and of
course
> the rest of it, too.
>
> How funny is it that the only thing necessary to get a thread 50 miles
long
> is to mention my name?


How funny is it that the only thing necessary for you to mention me is
for you to post? I already told you, John, KEEP ME THE FUCK OUT OF YOUR
MIND. Thanks.


And how funny that all you have to do to be
accused
> of being me is have a supernews feed, IE5, and a reasonably decent
command
> of the english language?

Decent command is an exaggeration. First off, you lying sack of shit,
you said you weren't even READING RSPW. You even told me YOURSELF that
you read it shortly after the PPV then stopped after that. You dumb son
of a bitch, face it, the supernews ARE you (well, most of them, anyway),
and your FUCKED UP EGO won't allow you to leave here otherwise without
the hopes of somebody mentioning your name. I can assure you John, if I
did mention your name, it wouldn't be in a positive sense.


>
> And hey, bob - it's "DeJong." Capital J.

J. for "Jackass," I assume.

>
> That said, off I go, again.


And again. And again. And again. Jeesus, John, don't you EVER shut the
fuck UP?


I just had to pop in here and laugh my
ass off
> at Stinko.


Who is laughing his ass off at YOU even harder. Especially after your
so-called "suicide" (ripped off from me, btw), your so-called "leaving"
RSPW for the 123063545463534523423th time, and the sudden appearance of
"friends" of yours out of literally virtually nowhere, as is typical
after each of your RSPW "retirements."


You disgust me, John. You make me SICK. I'm ashamed to be a member of
the same SPECIES of you. You IGNORANT, EMOTIONALLY HAZARDOUS SON OF A
DYING GROWTH-STUNTED TROGLODYTE. Die, you fucker. And next time, I'll
tell you how I REALLY feel. Asshole. You are nothing but a lowly,
cowardly, ignorant, egotistical, HORSE'S ASS, and I feel sorry for the
horse. I for one wish you all the worst of luck, and hope that you
decide to take a rest stop next time you're on the road, only with the
door open and the car moving. You stupid little RODENT. YOU FUCKING
HAIRY DECOMPOSING CAT SCROTUM. Die, John. Die!

> Chad told me about this guy and stink seeing me everywhere
he
> turns,

Chad talks too damn much---when he's not trying to stuff a whole cow
into his mouth. He claims to be building himself up to be a wrestler,
and I agree. He'd make a great wrestler. For Sumo. But that's not the
point, the point is, he talks alot of shit, you listen, and it gets
recycled to posts like these. You'd be smart to do what I have finally
decided to do and cut all ties with Chad and his cavernous hole he calls
a mouth.


and I had to come back and gloat a bit over all of it, being
the
> net.bastard that I am.


And being the net.fuckhead, net.dickhead, net.loser, net.psychotic...

"Fuck John Henry. The guy's a psycho nutball who can't mentally handle
RSPW." I do believe that's the best quote in this entire newsgroup
that I have EVER heard that describes you. I just wish I could remember
who said it...


> I think it's hilarious.


Really. Everyone's thinking the same about you, oddly enough.
Pete's right, you ARE trailer trash.

> This cat's pulling
your
> strings like a marionnette, sparky.

And the strings above you are from DFACS. Low blow, I know, but I don't
care. I'm laying it all down on the line for you, just like I KNOW you
love for people to do...right, "sparky"?


>
> And for whoever cares, the court situation seems to have turned out
for the
> positive.

You're going to jail? Your ex-wife is sleeping with the judge?


> I'm obviously not dead,

And that's too damn bad. I've often wondered of the reaction if I ever
actually DID pass on, and I've pondered it more than once. Yours, I
seriously would attend, if only to piss on your grave (literally), take
a bunch of photos, plaster the photos all over the 'net, then ghost
write your life story and sell it for a quarter of a million dollars.


I thank everyone that e-mailed for
their
> positive energy.


*snicker*


I've decided that as much as I sometimes wish I was,
I'm
> just not the suicidal type.

Damn. Damn, damn, damn. You pussy.


> Melodramatic, over-emotional, and
> manic-depressive, yes, but not suicidal.

You left out psychotic, emotionally unstable, anti-social, egotistical,
overbearing, claustrophobic...stop me when I'm getting warm here.


Sorry to disappoint anyone.
> (<--Sarcasm).

No SHIT, Sherlock.


Thank you again to all the well-wishers who e-mailed me
with
> their good will and in some cases, offers of assistance.


Was Kevorkian's home number in any of those?

>
> Nice to see everyone. Especially Pete, who, in my absence, seems to
have
> wholly given himself over to his intense desire to be me. I'm
flattered.

You should be. Apparantly, Pete's a better man than YOU ever could be.

>
> You can still find me on #rspwchat,


Like...I...Care.

and my new e-mail addy is in the
header
> of this message.


Food for the spam bots!
>
>

(snip the OB wrestling crap)


>
>


>
>
>

(snip the SCW crap)

I find it shameful you would use SCW as a crutch for your "return".


> Anyone wants to e-mail me, it's netba...@net-bastard.com The
> wrestlingfanz.com address still works as well. Mattie, I'll get hold
of you
> very soon, hopefully tomorrow. Bokonon, still haven't heard anything.
> There's a ton of people here I want to give props to, but I'm afraid
I'll
> leave someone out....FunkyM, Alex Cain is the COTSE troll that's been
giving
> you heat and impersonating you, and we all know what his opinions are
worth.

I impersonated Funky through Cotse ONCE. ONCE, John, and ONLY once, and
it was pretty obvious it was me. In fact, I made sure that people WOULD
think it was me. Any others, and they aren't me. Of course the one I
did was TWO MONTHS ago, but since I'm the center of your little world
along with Stink you simply haven't invented the watch in that
particular universe, have you? Hence that you can't FUCKING TELL TIME.
If you could you'd know yours had come and gone.


>
(snip more pointless crap and Satyr ass-kissing)


> And I think that's it. I'll lurk back occasionally,

Yea, right. You big bullshitter.


but it's usually
only
> when Chad tells me about some shit like Gancarski lying his pussy,
> child-molesting ass off about having met me or 'inviting' me to his
place to
> 'discuss' things.


Chad tells you, John, whatever is best suited for him. Here's a hint,
John, CHAD LIKES TO WORK PEOPLE. And he sucks at it. The mere fact
that he caught YOU in his little web of deceit is probably only because
you're a fucked up mental nutball who can't think straight.


Rest assured, you fat, worthless piece of shit, if
you
> ever met me face to face and had the balls to identify yourself, you
> wouldn't be able to brag about it here.

A threat? Surely the great John Henry wouldn't make a threat of MURDER?

> Stink, you idiot, you played
right
> into this Gibson dude's hands.


Well John since he's you, that's to be expected, now, isn't it?

Panaro, Cain, Avenger - get fucking
*lives*
> already.

See, John, here's where you fucked up. I haven't posted about you, said
anything about you, or done ANYTHING REMOTELY RELATED to you in RSPW for
about 1 1/2-2 months, tops, maybe slightly less, and yet YOU still bring
ME up. You bitch about people getting lives? Why don't you take YOURS,
then we'll talk. I'll get Liz Michaels to contact you from beyond the
grave. The ugly bitch has to be good for SOMETHING, after all.

You piss me off, John, bringing me into this shit, when I'm content to
let you sit on the sidelines and be made a fool of and bitch-slapped as
your various aliases who you claim aren't you. Don't you EVER fucking
bring up my name AGAIN unless you want another kick to the ass like this
one. Period. End of story. Asshole.

> Jesus, you're sad,

Pot. Kettle. Black!


> and each and every one of youhas an open
> invitation from me to drop on by an SCW show, IDENTIFY YOURSELF TO ME
- just
> ask around, people know who I am - and we shall settle our differences
> decisively.


You mean like that threat of MURDER that you just made to Gancarski a
little earlier? Tsk, tsk...what would your daughter say?

No wonder your wife doesn't want you near her. She knows how fucked up
you truly are.

Until then, you remain as you have always been -
lifeless,
> worthless losers taking jealous potshots at your superiors from behind
the
> safety screen of distance and in some cases anonymity.


Pot. Kettle. EXTREMELY black.
(Btw, JoJo, I never made ANY attempt to hide my hatred of you. FYI).


Tehawk, Proo,
and
> others - I realize that you never understood this, and probably never
will,
> and I'm not faulting you for it, but I do not now, nor have I ever,
thought
> I was 'better than everyone else.'


Even though a check of Deja finds at least four posts where you've said
so? Hypocrite.


> Only a few select idiots.


"better than everyone else" is the same as "only a few select."
You're either one, or the other, you dumb fucking heathen.


My
> self-appointed enemies, eef you weel (my enemies are always
self-appointed).

Can I appoint a successor? I'm reallllly getting sick and tired of
tearing you a new one every time you bring me up. What about FunkyM? I
heard he said that the way you dress makes you look like a dork.


> The vast majority of the newsgroup, I have never felt that I was
'better
> than.'

bullshit.


Sorry to hear that you see things otherwise. I guess my
ability to
> make people buy into the whole 'character' was better than I thought,


There is no more "character." The NetBastard "persona" ceased to exist
about a year ago when you combined it with your own "persona" and the
two merged into what is now a fucked up mind that hopefuly has a tumor
growing in it that will take you at an early age.


You dumb fucking bastard.


but I
> really figured most people would have the perception to realize that
my
> arrogant demeanor was bullshit.


Even though you say otherwise, via Deja, that it's not.


I'm easily one of the least
self-assured
> people I know


If you can be assured of suicide.

- the only things I'm certain that I am better than
average at
> are sex


I don't know about that...all you've managed to do is create a bastard
daughter.


playing the drums, and running my mouth.


If you shove the drums into your mouth, that problem is solved.


That's as straight
a
> shoot as there can be.

Too bad you weren't in the line of fire.

>
> I wish you all well.

I wish you plague, pestilence, and overstarched underwear, and, if you
so choose to avoid it by freeballing, I wish you an angry dog biting on
your crotch.

I might pop back in from time to time to shill
> something or whatever,

Shill what, the wonders and beauties of Prozac?


let y'all know what's going on with me if I get
back
> in the biz or whatever. Take care, everyone.

Die.

You asshole.

Peace out!

--Alex "aCE" Cain
"'Cuz I Said So!"

Tehawk

unread,
Apr 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/30/00
to
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000 11:13:38 GMT, another one of the millions and

millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as
alex...@my-deja.com shouted out:

>And that's too damn bad. I've often wondered of the reaction if I ever
>actually DID pass on, and I've pondered it more than once.

So you didn't see what happened when someone pretended that you killed
yourself? The reaction in this place was some people jumping for joy,
and others hoping that it was true..
There's nothing to wonder about Dink, if you killed yoiurself, there
would be a party in this place.
And if you're anywhere near as bad in the real world as you are in
here, people in the real world would have a party if you croaked.

The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
Apr 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/30/00
to

Tehawk wrote in message ...
>
>So you didn't see what happened when someone pretended that you killed
>yourself? The reaction in this place was some people jumping for joy,
>and others hoping that it was true..
>There's nothing to wonder about Dink, if you killed yoiurself, there
>would be a party in this place.
>And if you're anywhere near as bad in the real world as you are in
>here, people in the real world would have a party if you croaked.

Why don't you try it Chico. Now you want to talk party.

Diamond David Chance

unread,
Apr 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM4/30/00
to

<alex...@my-deja.com> wrote:

<snip>

What a mark...

Good Gawd!
DDC


Tehawk

unread,
May 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/1/00
to
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000 10:06:02 GMT, another one of the millions and

millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as
alex...@my-deja.com shouted out:

>John's always going to have a boner for you, Sting.


>If not you, then me. He seriously needs to take his own life
>by eating lead.
>

Funny, it looks like you and Stinger always have a boner for Dejong.
As you said you haven't posted in over a month, yet Dejong returns and
you respond to him like Palov's mutt. same for Stinger, who has this
need to warn the rest of the world of the Evils of Dejong.
Face it kiddies, Dejong posts and you guys always respond.
You're his trained dogs.

Robert Gibson's Glass Eye

unread,
May 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/1/00
to
<alex...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8eh4gu$31a$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

(snip)

Has anyone ever cared about anything you have ever had to say?

The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
May 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/1/00
to

Robert Gibson's Glass Eye wrote in message ...

Much of the same can be said for you Sparky.

Tehawk

unread,
May 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/3/00
to
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:52:58 -0400, another one of the millions and

millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
<St...@erols.com> shouted out:

>Tehawk wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 06:59:18 -0400, another one of the millions and
>> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
>> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>>
>> >Tehawk wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:16:09 -0400, another one of the millions and
>> >> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
>> >> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>> >>
>> >> >Tehawk wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:35:14 -0400, another one of the millions and
>> >> >> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
>> >> >> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Tehawk wrote:
>> >> >> >>

>> >> >> >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 07:30:49 -0400, another one of the millions and


>> >> >> >> millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as The Bogus Sting
>> >> >> >> <St...@erols.com> shouted out:
>> >> >> >>

>> >> >> >> >This message mainly goes out to Palij, Choad, Proulx, and all those who
>> >> >> >> >blame _ME_ for JH's bad behavior. I'll have you all notice that I've
>> >> >> >> >intentionally left him alone for the last week, and what has he done?
>> >> >> >> >That's right--argued politics and stirred up shit with Liz Michael. He
>> >> >> >> >HAS NOT posted on-topic nor has he been pleasant.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Oh, and in case you haven't recognized him, he's posting under the name
>> >> >> >> >Robert Gibson's Glass Eye.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>

>> >> >> >> In case you haven't noticed since you only pay attenbtion to postings
>> >> >> >> by ceratin people, most posters in here did the same thing.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Very true, but I'm not blamed for THEIR bad habits, just JH's.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And who do you blame for yours?
>> >> >
>> >> >Nobody but myself. Is there a point you're trying to make?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Now if he was doing it all by himself, that would be a different
>> >> >> >> story. A couple of dozen people were doing the same thing this week
>> >> >> >> including myself.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >It's not that hard to understand--I was accused of being the bad
>> >> >> >influence on JH, not on you.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Funny I never saw anyone accuse you of being an influence on Dejong.
>> >> >
>> >> >But don't let that stop you from interjecting your opinion on the
>> >> >matter. Sheesh!
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> You're always injecting yourself in threads that don't involve you in
>> >> the first place, as long as your favorite people are already in it.
>> >> You're the last person that can complain if anyone else does it.
>> >
>> >Very much like Palij, rather than reply to the actual point, you go out
>> >of your way to toss an insult/show that I'm a hypocrite of some sort.
>> >Nice dodge.
>> >
>>
>> You make a remark that I inject myself in threads that don't involve
>> me. I point how that it's no different from what you do. I guess
>> that's too hard for you to understand.
>
>Not at all. But what I have discovered is that you're making this into
>a huge tangent instead of commenting on the point I made. Case closed.

As usual you're putting your tail between your legs and running off
when you're losing an arugment.

A - You claimed that people were saying that you're responsible for
Dejong's behavior, but when asked to prove that people made this
claim, you cop out by claiming that you can't be bothered to look it
up in DejaNews.

B - Despite your claims, he has posted on topic for the threads in
which he has involved himself in. A point you choose to overlook.

C - I have coimmented on the point you made. It's not my fault if
you're too damn stupid to see that.


>
>
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> If anything he's been an influence on you.
>> >> >> BTW, I've never claimed that anyone influenced me in anyway in this
>> >> >> place, unlike your pet drone who claims he doesn't like me posting in
>> >> >> your threads.
>> >> >
>> >> >Okay, enlighten me...who (nN) is my "pet drone" ???
>> >>
>> >> Look elsewhere in this thread. He's some dope that started following
>> >> me around because he claims he got upset that I "dared" to interject
>> >> myself in one of your posts.
>> >> Here's a clue, he's doing teh same thing you're accusing Dejong of
>> >> doing, except that he's copying the name of another poster.
>> >
>> >What does this have to do with me? This is really, really, thin.
>>
>> He's claiming he's doing it on your behalf.
>> Do I have to draw a road map?
>
>I had no idea. Nor do I care. Plus, he denies it.

So you take the word of a guy that flames people while hiding behind
another posters name. How intelligent.
Now I could do a Dejanews search for that posting where he made that
claim, but to use your own words, I don't feel like bothering to look
it up.
After all if you refuse to provide proof, you can't expect anyone else
to bother.

Robert Gibson's Glass Eye

unread,
May 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/3/00
to
"The Infamous Stone Golem" <stone...@aol.commence> wrote in message
news:sgqs3st...@corp.supernews.com...

> >Has anyone ever cared about anything you have ever had to say?

> Much of the same can be said for you Sparky.

Yes, but it would only be said by idiots like you.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
May 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/3/00
to

How do you figure? You're the one who resurrected this dead thread.
What's the matter--couldn't find attention anywhere else?


> A - You claimed that people were saying that you're responsible for
> Dejong's behavior, but when asked to prove that people made this
> claim, you cop out by claiming that you can't be bothered to look it
> up in DejaNews.

A point made by OTHER people. So are you saying he never said that? If
you're going to press this issue and dig yourself a bigger hole, maybe I
will find the quotes.


> B - Despite your claims, he has posted on topic for the threads in
> which he has involved himself in. A point you choose to overlook.

Not at all. Those few instances when he posts on topic and stays
pleasant, I leave him alone. You and the rest of the moron-clan confuse
that with not acknowledging that they exist.


> C - I have coimmented on the point you made. It's not my fault if
> you're too damn stupid to see that.

Your only comments were that I'm in no position to point out your
atrocious behavior because I'm guilty myself--so you completely ignore
what I said to turn this into a 'you're a hypocrite' bullshit argument.


> >
> >
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> If anything he's been an influence on you.
> >> >> >> BTW, I've never claimed that anyone influenced me in anyway in this
> >> >> >> place, unlike your pet drone who claims he doesn't like me posting in
> >> >> >> your threads.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Okay, enlighten me...who (nN) is my "pet drone" ???
> >> >>
> >> >> Look elsewhere in this thread. He's some dope that started following
> >> >> me around because he claims he got upset that I "dared" to interject
> >> >> myself in one of your posts.
> >> >> Here's a clue, he's doing teh same thing you're accusing Dejong of
> >> >> doing, except that he's copying the name of another poster.
> >> >
> >> >What does this have to do with me? This is really, really, thin.
> >>
> >> He's claiming he's doing it on your behalf.
> >> Do I have to draw a road map?
> >
> >I had no idea. Nor do I care. Plus, he denies it.
>
> So you take the word of a guy that flames people while hiding behind
> another posters name.

I didn't say I believe him. Stop putting words in my mouth.


> How intelligent.

Where's your certificate?


> Now I could do a Dejanews search for that posting where he made that
> claim, but to use your own words, I don't feel like bothering to look
> it up.

Don't bother. Like I said (and you are too stupid to understand), I
really don't care.


> After all if you refuse to provide proof, you can't expect anyone else
> to bother.

If you keep painting yourself into a corner, maybe it'll be worth it to
me just to see you backpedal your way out of this.

The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
May 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/3/00
to

Tehawk wrote in message <6f6vgs8slodhgf4v4...@4ax.com>...

>
>As usual you're putting your tail between your legs and running off
>when you're losing an arugment.
>
>A - You claimed that people were saying that you're responsible for
>Dejong's behavior, but when asked to prove that people made this
>claim, you cop out by claiming that you can't be bothered to look it
>up in DejaNews.
>
>B - Despite your claims, he has posted on topic for the threads in
>which he has involved himself in. A point you choose to overlook.
>
>C - I have coimmented on the point you made. It's not my fault if
>you're too damn stupid to see that.
>
>
>
>So you take the word of a guy that flames people while hiding behind
>another posters name. How intelligent.
>Now I could do a Dejanews search for that posting where he made that
>claim, but to use your own words, I don't feel like bothering to look
>it up.
>After all if you refuse to provide proof, you can't expect anyone else
>to bother.
>

At least Sting confronts his critics Chico. All you can do is refer to them
in indirect posts. People would say you're chicken shit.

The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
May 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/3/00
to

Robert Gibson's Glass Eye wrote in message <8eoqeb$k40$0...@pita.alt.net>...

But read and answered by fuckwads like you jailbird.

The Bogus Sting

unread,
May 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/3/00
to
The Infamous Stone Golem wrote:
>
> Robert Gibson's Glass Eye wrote in message <8eoqeb$k40$0...@pita.alt.net>...
> >"The Infamous Stone Golem" <stone...@aol.commence> wrote in message
> >news:sgqs3st...@corp.supernews.com...
> >> >Has anyone ever cared about anything you have ever had to say?
> >
> >> Much of the same can be said for you Sparky.
> >
> >Yes, but it would only be said by idiots like you.
> >
> >
>
> But read and answered by fuckwads like you jailbird.

HAHAHA! It cracks me up when people bitch and moan like this about how
such-and-such's opinion doesn't matter, and then they harp on EVERY post
that person makes.

Mark Troll

unread,
May 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/3/00
to

"The Infamous Stone Golem" <stone...@aol.commence> wrote in message
news:sh0kdsp...@corp.supernews.com...

>
> Robert Gibson's Glass Eye wrote in message <8eoqeb$k40$0...@pita.alt.net>...
> >"The Infamous Stone Golem" <stone...@aol.commence> wrote in message
> >news:sgqs3st...@corp.supernews.com...
> >> >Has anyone ever cared about anything you have ever had to say?
> >
> >> Much of the same can be said for you Sparky.
> >
> >Yes, but it would only be said by idiots like you.
> >
> >
>
> But read and answered by fuckwads like you jailbird.
>

Jailbird?

--

Mark Troll


The Infamous Stone Golem

unread,
May 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/4/00
to

Tehawk wrote in message <8v94hs4trub1n2rb5...@4ax.com>...
>
>I don';t waste my time with a pussy that doesn't have the balls to use
>his regular name but instead hides behind someone else's name.
>As I told you before, as long as you continue to post as Stonegolym
>you are proving to me and to everyone else in here that you are noting
>but a no ball pussy. Nothing you say or do will change that as long
>as you continue to post as Stonegolym.
>You want me to respond, then grow some balls and use your regular
>name, continue using the Stone name and all you're saying that you're
>a gutless wonder that isn't worth wasting my time with.

I could care less if you respond Chico. But you're the pussy that's
continues to talk about me in every post behind my back. You're just too
chicken shit to admit it. Stink proved that today already.

Tehawk

unread,
May 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM5/5/00
to
On Wed, 3 May 2000 08:33:56 -0400, another one of the millions and
millions of the Hawk's fans, the person known as "The Infamous Stone
Golem" <stone...@aol.commence> shouted out:

>
>Tehawk wrote in message <6f6vgs8slodhgf4v4...@4ax.com>...
>>

>>As usual you're putting your tail between your legs and running off
>>when you're losing an arugment.
>>
>>A - You claimed that people were saying that you're responsible for
>>Dejong's behavior, but when asked to prove that people made this
>>claim, you cop out by claiming that you can't be bothered to look it
>>up in DejaNews.
>>
>>B - Despite your claims, he has posted on topic for the threads in
>>which he has involved himself in. A point you choose to overlook.
>>
>>C - I have coimmented on the point you made. It's not my fault if
>>you're too damn stupid to see that.
>>
>>
>>

>>So you take the word of a guy that flames people while hiding behind
>>another posters name. How intelligent.
>>Now I could do a Dejanews search for that posting where he made that
>>claim, but to use your own words, I don't feel like bothering to look
>>it up.
>>After all if you refuse to provide proof, you can't expect anyone else
>>to bother.
>>
>

>At least Sting confronts his critics Chico. All you can do is refer to them
>in indirect posts. People would say you're chicken shit.
>
>--Stone

I don';t waste my time with a pussy that doesn't have the balls to use


his regular name but instead hides behind someone else's name.
As I told you before, as long as you continue to post as Stonegolym
you are proving to me and to everyone else in here that you are noting
but a no ball pussy. Nothing you say or do will change that as long
as you continue to post as Stonegolym.
You want me to respond, then grow some balls and use your regular
name, continue using the Stone name and all you're saying that you're
a gutless wonder that isn't worth wasting my time with.

Tehawk ©2000

0 new messages