Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

dtc.mailing-list.fw-1-mailinglist

Contact owners and managers

1–30 of 3430

0 selected

news.gofast.net

9/19/01

Norton Antivirus for Firewalls

We are thinking of using Norton Antivirus for Firewalls for HTTP and FTP. 1) Are you happy with the

unread,

Norton Antivirus for Firewalls

We are thinking of using Norton Antivirus for Firewalls for HTTP and FTP. 1) Are you happy with the

9/19/01

8/3/01

Log export truncates IP addresses

Hi all, I have to analyse an exported log file from fw1. I did not export them by myself. The problem

unread,

Log export truncates IP addresses

Hi all, I have to analyse an exported log file from fw1. I did not export them by myself. The problem

8/3/01

Tadakazu Yoshimura

12/18/00

Inquiry: Mailinglist of Martin Luther King,Jr.

Dear netters, Can you tell me mailinglist about Martin Luther King, Jr. I was very impressed by his

unread,

Inquiry: Mailinglist of Martin Luther King,Jr.

Dear netters, Can you tell me mailinglist about Martin Luther King, Jr. I was very impressed by his

12/18/00

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

12/18/98

[FW1] Scary traffic - long

Sorry for the cross post, but I am troubled by this traffic and I think it may be a serious problem.

unread,

[FW1] Scary traffic - long

Sorry for the cross post, but I am troubled by this traffic and I think it may be a serious problem.

12/18/98

gm...@my-dejanews.com

8/17/98

Websense: Internet access hangs

I have installed Websense on an NT machine and FW-1 is running on a Sun Box. Access to a restricted

unread,

Websense: Internet access hangs

I have installed Websense on an NT machine and FW-1 is running on a Sun Box. Access to a restricted

8/17/98

sprat...@ppa.nhs.uk, fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com2

8/10/98

[FW1] FW-1 Books

Building Internet Firewalls or better yet, check out www.ora.com On Fri, 7 Aug 1998 spratt_dave@ppa.

unread,

[FW1] FW-1 Books

Building Internet Firewalls or better yet, check out www.ora.com On Fri, 7 Aug 1998 spratt_dave@ppa.

8/10/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/9/98

Brian hi, I see no problems I have seen Solaris with no encryption and with NAT handle 12 Mbps with

unread,

Brian hi, I see no problems I have seen Solaris with no encryption and with NAT handle 12 Mbps with

8/9/98

SLo...@ci.tacoma.wa.us, fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com3

8/9/98

[FW1] "No Response from Server" Error

I am installing a FW on a dual CPU machine at one customer site and we choose to run the GUI from

unread,

[FW1] "No Response from Server" Error

I am installing a FW on a dual CPU machine at one customer site and we choose to run the GUI from

8/9/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com7

8/9/98

[FW1] [NT] Near 100% CPU utilization

I agree with you, and it is a very good point to add the hosts file. Most of the NT 100% CPU

unread,

[FW1] [NT] Near 100% CPU utilization

I agree with you, and it is a very good point to add the hosts file. Most of the NT 100% CPU

8/9/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/9/98

[FW1] Automated "Armoring Solaris"

Recently I posted an article recommending ways to armor Solaris. I have received alot of great

unread,

[FW1] Automated "Armoring Solaris"

Recently I posted an article recommending ways to armor Solaris. I have received alot of great

8/9/98

Alan...@na.manpower.com, fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com2

8/9/98

[FW1] AAA question

Session w/ implicit Client auth is what I usually do for that. As far as authenticating against the

unread,

[FW1] AAA question

Session w/ implicit Client auth is what I usually do for that. As far as authenticating against the

8/9/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com, Alan...@na.manpower.com5

8/9/98

[FW1] Why run FW-1 on Unix vs. NT? -Reply

If anyone has some well, thought-out reasoning as to why you should pick one OS over another, email

unread,

[FW1] Why run FW-1 on Unix vs. NT? -Reply

If anyone has some well, thought-out reasoning as to why you should pick one OS over another, email

8/9/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/9/98

[FW1] question about FW_1 installation

Hi all: Does fw-1 installation disable UDP checksums in solaris 2.x kernel? TIA _ming ===============

unread,

[FW1] question about FW_1 installation

Hi all: Does fw-1 installation disable UDP checksums in solaris 2.x kernel? TIA _ming ===============

8/9/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/9/98

fellow firewall users, OS: Solaris 2.5.1 Firewall: 3.0b Hardware: Ultra Enterprise 1 with 384mb The

unread,

fellow firewall users, OS: Solaris 2.5.1 Firewall: 3.0b Hardware: Ultra Enterprise 1 with 384mb The

8/9/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/9/98

[FW1] hardware for firewall

fellow firewall users, OS: Solaris 2.5.1 Firewall: 3.0b Hardware: Ultra Enterprise 1 with 384mb The

unread,

[FW1] hardware for firewall

fellow firewall users, OS: Solaris 2.5.1 Firewall: 3.0b Hardware: Ultra Enterprise 1 with 384mb The

8/9/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com2

8/8/98

[FW1] Why run FW-1 on Unix vs. NT?

Diana hi, with encryption on NT you should get 2Mbps which is E1 so if your internet feed is <= 2M

unread,

[FW1] Why run FW-1 on Unix vs. NT?

Diana hi, with encryption on NT you should get 2Mbps which is E1 so if your internet feed is <= 2M

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com2

8/8/98

[FW1] FW-1 Backup

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jack Culbertson wrote: I am running FW-1 3.0b under

unread,

[FW1] FW-1 Backup

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jack Culbertson wrote: I am running FW-1 3.0b under

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com3

8/8/98

[FW1] PhoneBoy's FireWall-1 FAQ Page

>I do not have access to the Checkpoint FAQ since the page is password >protected. We

unread,

[FW1] PhoneBoy's FireWall-1 FAQ Page

>I do not have access to the Checkpoint FAQ since the page is password >protected. We

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/8/98

[FW1] help required

Hello everybody, I am a novice in this field. I wanted to know a couple of things about firewall-1. 1

unread,

[FW1] help required

Hello everybody, I am a novice in this field. I wanted to know a couple of things about firewall-1. 1

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/8/98

[FW1] CryptoCard vrs. ACE Server

Hi, I'm palnning to install an autentication server in my organization. I'm using FW-1 and a

unread,

[FW1] CryptoCard vrs. ACE Server

Hi, I'm palnning to install an autentication server in my organization. I'm using FW-1 and a

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/8/98

[FW1] Selective email blocking

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello World, Anybody has any docu or experience with

unread,

[FW1] Selective email blocking

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello World, Anybody has any docu or experience with

8/8/98

jon_...@my-dejanews.com, budz...@my-dejanews.com2

8/8/98

FW-1, Surfwatch, and rules.

This sounds like a familiar and simple problem to fix. You probably need to run the Firewall

unread,

FW-1, Surfwatch, and rules.

This sounds like a familiar and simple problem to fix. You probably need to run the Firewall

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com3

8/8/98

[FW1] DST 224.0.0.2

Hello, 224.0.0.2 is a multicast address. I believe that OSPF uses 224.0.0.2 to send out routing

unread,

[FW1] DST 224.0.0.2

Hello, 224.0.0.2 is a multicast address. I believe that OSPF uses 224.0.0.2 to send out routing

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/8/98

FW: [FW1] Why run FW-1 on Unix vs. NT? -Reply

re: NT/ Sun If anyone is interested I ported TIS FW Toolkit to the C-64. It runs fine and saves a lot

unread,

FW: [FW1] Why run FW-1 on Unix vs. NT? -Reply

re: NT/ Sun If anyone is interested I ported TIS FW Toolkit to the C-64. It runs fine and saves a lot

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com, tom.k...@emjay.com10

8/8/98

[FW1] FireWall-1 3.0b patch 3072

According to Andrew J. Kalat: > > > Another caveat for the list, > The 3072 patch

unread,

[FW1] FireWall-1 3.0b patch 3072

According to Andrew J. Kalat: > > > Another caveat for the list, > The 3072 patch

8/8/98

jve...@milleraviation.com, fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com4

8/8/98

[FW1] SecuRemote and Lotus Notes

>Yes, we are doing both encapsulation and NAT. Also I neglected to mention >that we have patch

unread,

[FW1] SecuRemote and Lotus Notes

>Yes, we are doing both encapsulation and NAT. Also I neglected to mention >that we have patch

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/8/98

[FW1] Attachements

Yes, eSafe Protect Gateway does this specifically for Firewall-1, along with much more content

unread,

[FW1] Attachements

Yes, eSafe Protect Gateway does this specifically for Firewall-1, along with much more content

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/8/98

[FW1] FW1 stopped running after 23 hours of service: FW-1: log message queue is full

Has anyone had experience with Solstice FW1 failing after 23 hours with the following error message?

unread,

[FW1] FW1 stopped running after 23 hours of service: FW-1: log message queue is full

Has anyone had experience with Solstice FW1 failing after 23 hours with the following error message?

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/8/98

[FW1] Logexport column names

Is there a good explanation for the column names that show up in a logexport file? For example, there

unread,

[FW1] Logexport column names

Is there a good explanation for the column names that show up in a logexport file? For example, there

8/8/98

fw-1-mailin...@lists.us.checkpoint.com

8/8/98

[FW1] NAT on virtual interface

Hello, Is it possible to use NAT on a virtual interface. We have two interfaces at the moment. On the

unread,

[FW1] NAT on virtual interface

Hello, Is it possible to use NAT on a virtual interface. We have two interfaces at the moment. On the

8/8/98

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu