how 2004 wuz won
Renata
miand...@students.mcg.edu
> ah... this is how w did it - the urban, white voter.
>
> http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0706/S00165.htm
horrible article because if you're going to address "how the election
was won", I want to know how Bush was able to capture additional votes
from urban whites in cleveland, miami, etc........All of the bigcity
shifts they list are cities in states where a decent sized urban shift
from 2000 is irrelevant. I don't care what happens in dallas, new
york, or san jose.
stephenj
> On Jun 14, 2:13 pm, Renata <no-...@norealbox.com> wrote:
>
>>ah... this is how w did it - the urban, white voter.
>>
>>http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0706/S00165.htm
>
>
> horrible article because if you're going to address "how the election
> was won", I want to know how Bush was able to capture additional votes
> from urban whites in cleveland, miami, etc..
Bush was credible on national security, while kerry wasn't. that's a
good reason for any voter, urban or rural, white or black, to vote for bush.
--
Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature,
the heart of a heartless world and the soul of soulless conditions.
It is the opium of the people.
- Karl Marx
Renata
>On Jun 14, 2:13 pm, Renata <no-...@norealbox.com> wrote:
>> ah... this is how w did it - the urban, white voter.
>>
>> http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0706/S00165.htm
>
>horrible article because if you're going to address "how the election
>was won", I want to know how Bush was able to capture additional votes
>from urban whites in cleveland, miami, etc........
He didn't.
>All of the bigcity
>shifts they list are cities in states where a decent sized urban shift
>from 2000 is irrelevant. I don't care what happens in dallas, new
>york, or san jose.
Please review your Reading Comprehension 101 notes, reread article,
then post questions.