ASSORTED ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS (PART 1193)

[David Von Pein]

http://Amazon.com/forum/history/ref=cm_cd_et_md_pl?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx33HXI3XVZDC8G&cdMsgID=Mx3NM5847I6UKTD&cdMsgNo=5082&cdPage=204&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx1UOFP7W4CBPU#Mx3NM5847I6UKTD

A CONSPIRACY THEORIST KNOWN AS "M" SAID:

David V Pain [sic] is a poor judge of character. He truly believes that all those people working for the government were honest and interested in facts. Of course, people like him, Bugliosi, McAdams, Posner, et al. only believe that under the condition that their "facts" point to Oswald's guilt only.

They ignore witnesses that contradict their claims, and completely dismiss honest witnesses such as Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig who had no reason to lie. His honesty and refusal to change his story cost him dearly, his life included.

I would like to know what Mr. David the Pain [sic; how cute] thinks about Roger Craig's testimony.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

It's truly hilarious hearing "M" defend such an "honest" witness like Roger D. Craig.

Evidently, ol' "M" doesn't even realize that Craig's lie about seeing the words "7.65 Mauser" stamped on the TSBD rifle was proven to be a lie by Craig's own words--via this 1968 newspaper article ("RC" is Roger Craig):

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HUtF3fCD1y8/UXlLbLdJNhI/AAAAAAAAuRg/YKInldasQ5E/s1600/RogerCraigInterview.jpg

So much for "Honest" Roger.


"M" SAID:

Where did you get that photo? Where is the original article? Who wrote it?

Show me the original newspaper clip of Craig's interview where he claims the Mauser was found [on] the roof. Otherwise, you have nothing but lies and fraudulent evidence. But what's new?

I'm looking forward to what you have to offer in the form of proof.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

The photo linked below depicts a newspaper page from the March 1st, 1968, edition of the Los Angeles Free Press:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HUtF3fCD1y8/UXlLbLdJNhI/AAAAAAAAuRg/YKInldasQ5E/s1600/RogerCraigInterview.jpg

Naturally, "M" thinks the above newspaper scan is "fraudulent" and is a fake. (Gee, what a surprise.)

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/craig.htm#mauser

Here is another page from the L.A. article. The initials "PJ" in the article, btw, stand for Penn Jones, who was also being interviewed for the same article:

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/images/craigandjonespage10.jpg


ADDENDUM #1:

Here's a PDF file for the LA Free Press article, including a picture (albeit a fuzzy one) showing Roger Craig and Penn Jones at the LA Free Press offices....

http://app.box.com/s/n0hkvccua7iczh71h5bp

Is that whole newspaper a fake, "M", including the three Peanuts comic strips on page 26?


ADDENDUM #2:

Here's Page 1 of the LA Free Press paper for March 1, 1968, including the name of the person who wrote the Craig/Jones article. Her name is Jeanne Morgan:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-nq6mPpc6Z0g/UtN-4YwQTEI/AAAAAAAAxn4/tQGl1cOlMn4/s1600/LA-Free-Press-March-1-1968-Page-1.jpg

[syne...@gmail.com]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

The photo linked below depicts a newspaper page from the March 1st, 1968, edition of the Los Angeles Free Press:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HUtF3fCD1y8/UXlLbLdJNhI/AAAAAAAAuRg/YKInldasQ5E/s1600/RogerCraigInterview.jpg

Naturally, "M" thinks the above newspaper scan is "fraudulent" and is a fake. (Gee, what a surprise.

M:

Naturally, I don't even think that's a newspaper.

That's just a .jpg of nothing but text, easily created.

DVP Says:

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/craig.htm#mauser

M:
Lmao, nice try, posting the #1 disinformation artist, McAdams' deceptive arguments isn't proof of anything except of your sychophantic tendencies.

DVP says:

Here is another page from the L.A. article. The initials "PJ" in the article, btw, stand for Penn Jones, who was also being interviewed for the same article:

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/images/craigandjonespage10.jpg

M:

Hahaha.. again, another .jpg of nothing, it is not from an original newspaper, anyone can duplicate and/or create a newspaper looking clip.

DVP says:

ADDENDUM #1:

Here's a PDF file for the LA Free Press article, including a picture (albeit a fuzzy one) showing Roger Craig and Penn Jones at the LA Free Press offices....

http://app.box.com/s/n0hkvccua7iczh71h5bp

Is that whole newspaper a fake, "M", including the three Peanuts comic strips on page 26?


ADDENDUM #2:

Here's Page 1 of the LA Free Press paper for March 1, 1968, including the name of the person who wrote the Craig/Jones article. Her name is Jeanne Morgan:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-nq6mPpc6Z0g/UtN-4YwQTEI/AAAAAAAAxn4/tQGl1cOlMn4/s1600/LA-Free-Press-March-1-1968-Page-1.jpg

M:

You can "ADDENDUM" all you want, the links you offered are nothing but easily forged
photos of an interview that it couldn't or could have happened, without the originals, you got nothing.

Those alleged "newspaper articles" proof nothing, and I don't believe Deputy Sheriff Craig would stick to his original story for all those years, then in 1968, all of the sudden, decides to change part of the story (the Mouser part), then decided to go back to the original story for the remaining years up to his death.

Please oh please! you shills will stop at nothing to discredit those who tell the truth while defending the real liars, McAdams being one of them, and by default, you.

Either produce an actual newspaper clip of the article from that newspaper's website, if they have one or STFU.

I've yet to see real evidence for any of your claims.

[Walt]

Oh Boy (sigh).... I'm forced to support Von Pea Brain.

Roger Craig was a liar.... and a sick man.... I believe that you're right in calling him an honest man. I believe he was an honest sick man who's brain didn't function well. He was torn by the murder of President Kennedy. He knew that the truth was being covered up and hidden by the all of the law enforcement authorities. He KNEW that for certain.... He knew that Lee Oswald had been framed, and attempted to roll back the rug that concealed the dirty truth. However ...Just as Mark Furman tried to insure the conviction of the guilty OJ Simpson by falsifing evidence, Craig lied about having seen a 7.65 Mauser pulled from beneath the stack of book boxes wher the rifle had been CAREFULLY HIDDEN. Craig did not invent the lie...He merely assumed that another Deputy named Seymour Weitzman was correct in his speculation that the rifle "looked like a 7.65 mauser". Craig believed that Weitzman knew what he was talking about and picked up that erroneous identification of the rifle and would not admit that he was wrong for believing Weitzman. His sick mind invented stories to support Weitzman's mis identification of the rifle.

Oh how it pains me to be forced into supporting Davey Von Pea Brain.....

[M.]

On Monday, January 13, 2014 5:07:59 PM UTC-8, David Von Pein wrote:

M.:
You can "ADDENDUM" all you want, the links you offered are nothing but easily forged photos of an interview that it could or couldn't have happened, without the originals, you got nothing. Those alleged "newspaper articles" proof nothing, and I don't believe Deputy Sheriff Craig would stick to his original story for all those years, then in 1968, all of the sudden, decides to change part of the story (the Mouser part), then decided to go back to the original story for the remaining years up to his death. Please oh please! you shills will stop at nothing to discredit those who tell the truth while defending the real liars, McAdams being one of them, and by default, you. Either produce an actual newspaper clip of the article from that newspaper website, if they have one or STphkU. I've yet to see real evidence for any of your claims.

Please post a link to the actual newspaper articles, originating from the newspaper that published it.
I'm looking forward to it.

I doubt you'll 1. publish this post and 2. provide what I'm asking for.

Have a nice day

[Walt]

The best way to determine the truth is ...USE YOUR GOD GIVEN EYES AND BRAIN.

LOOOK at the photos and video taken by Tom Alyea and many other news photographers that day..... Tom Alyea filmmed the rifle INSIDE the TSBD when it was lifted from BENEATH boxes of books, and while Lt Day examined it for finger prints. Then several news photographers OUTSIDE the RSBD photographed the rifle as Lt. Day carried it from the building.

Just LOOK at the photos and use you God given brain.