Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Judyth Vary Baker

20 views
Skip to first unread message

David Von Pein

unread,
Jul 15, 2013, 1:35:26 AM7/15/13
to

http://Oswald-Not-Guilty.blogspot.com/2013/06/when-they-tell-you-oswald-killed.html

I just came across the above blog post from one of Judyth Baker's websites, in which Judyth attempts (once again) to exonerate her alleged "lover", Lee Harvey Oswald. And in that blog post from June 8, 2013, she tries to exonerate him by responding to things I have written about Lee Oswald's guilt in my blog (linked below).

http://Oswald-Is-Guilty.blogspot.com

Naturally, in my opinion, Baker fails miserably in her attempts to debunk anything I wrote concerning Oswald's guilt. And she just ignores or bypasses most of the points that I made on my blog, and the items she did address in her own blog post amount to pretty much the same old worn-out tripe that we've seen time and again from desperate conspiracy theorists, as Judyth turns a blind eye to the huge stack of evidence that proves her so-called "lover" was a double-murderer. Baker even tries to deny that Lee ever owned a rifle in 1963:

"I KNEW LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND HIS TASTE IN GUNS. .... I NEVER SAW A RIFLE BELONGING TO LEE OSWALD. .... LEE OSWALD WOULD NEVER HAVE PURCHASED A TRACEABLE, CLUMSY, INFERIOR RIFLE BY MONEY ORDER." -- Judyth Vary Baker; 6/8/2013

Naturally, then, Judyth has no choice but to believe that all of the paperwork associated with Lee's 1963 Carcano rifle purchase has been faked or forged or falsely manufactured in some manner, including this internal piece of paperwork generated by Klein's Sporting Goods in Chicago (Waldman Exhibit No. 7):

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh21/html/WH_Vol21_0364a.htm

Judyth Vary Baker and Alek James Hidell have a lot in common. They're both phonies.

David Von Pein
July 15, 2013

----------------------

ALSO SEE:
http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/2010/09/judyth-vary-baker.html

David Von Pein

unread,
Jul 15, 2013, 5:44:13 AM7/15/13
to
I've added some more rebuttals to Baker's Baloney:

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2013/07/judyth-vary-baker-part-2.html

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 15, 2013, 8:06:50 AM7/15/13
to
I wonder what Baker has to say about the AUTOGRAPHED photo of Oswald, holding his rifle, that the HSCAe discovered.

It's quite obvious that she barely even KNEW Oswald.

Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

0 new messages