movie "Parkland" to blu-ray

[doctorw]

It is such a good movie (NOT), and has done so well at the box office
(NOT), that Tom Hanks (and Bill Paxton?; or, did Paxton bail-out on it?)
and their Hollywierd-o cronies feel the anxieties-ridden need to
super-quickly rush it directly to blu-ray on Nov 5th - a meager one-month
after it (barely) premiered.

http://www.wearemoviegeeks.com/2013/10/parkland-available-on-blu-ray-dvd-november-5/


38th lowest film on the film gross sales list ending 10-13-13 (25th after
its first week), with it generating only a NOT whopping, NOT seen-by-many
total of $528,000 after 2-weeks. (after a lowly $310,000 premier weekend)

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/


How much did Bugliosi receive ($1,000,000, or more ?) for the movie rights
of that estimated $10,000,000 cost POS?

[David Von Pein]

The "Parkland" film will surely get a wider release to many more theaters come November. (Won't it?)

It would be kind of silly to release a movie about the JFK assassination and then have it NOT in many, many theaters on the 50th anniversary of that historic event.....don't you think?

I predict that "Parkland" will end up doing pretty well at the box office once all of its receipts are tallied---after November or December 2013.

[doctorw]

On Saturday, October 19, 2013 11:07:47 AM UTC-4, David Von Pein wrote:
> The "Parkland" film will surely get a wider release to many more theaters come November. (Won't it?)
>
>

Incorrect. The "parkland" POS, surely, never expanded to even more
theaters.

>
> It would be kind of silly to release a movie about the JFK assassination and then have it NOT in many, many theaters on the 50th anniversary of that historic event.....don't you think?
>
>

The "parkland" POS fabricators must be the one's who did not think (and
they did not "think" before/during/after its fabrication's), and they were
silly - they quickly saw the writing-on-the-wall and they pulled-it-out of
all theaters by Nov 7th.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=parkland.htm

>
> I predict that "Parkland" will end up doing pretty well at the box office once all of its receipts are tallied---after November or December 2013.

Incorrect and yet again wrong. (Don't you think?) The $10,000,000-plus
costs POS stinker had gross sales of a measly $653651 to Nov 7th - meaning
it only had gross paltry sales of $128000 in its terminal,
dead-on-arrival, last 24 days.

Not including its advertising costs, the Bugliosi-based POS lost over
$9,346,000.

[David Von Pein]

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2345112/releaseinfo?ref_=tt_ov_inf

BTW, "Parkland" is a pretty good film. Not great, but good. (IMO.)

http://classic--movies.blogspot.com/2013/11/parkland.html