Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Sick Senator Wants Lawmakers Locked In Room With Dead Babies

32 views
Skip to first unread message

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 29, 2019, 7:20:00 AM1/29/19
to
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-gun-control-requires-locked-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/?utm_term=.97a62f0f9d9f

Sen. Kamala D. Harris, the California Democrat and presidential
aspirant, lamented on Monday the lack of congressional action on gun
control, saying a solution would have been possible after the 2012
massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School
in Newtown, Conn., if only lawmakers had been placed in “a locked
room, no press, no one, nobody else” and required to examine “the
autopsy photographs of those babies.”

“And then, you vote your conscience,” she said at a CNN town hall in
Des Moines. “This has become a political issue.”

Harris, neck and neck with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as America's
dumbest lawmakers, went on to screech about changing the meaning of
the word "safety" to mean "gun ban," just as they have changed the
meaning of the word "man" to mean "whatever the fuck you happen to be
'feeling' at the moment."

Just Wondering

unread,
Jan 29, 2019, 1:13:15 PM1/29/19
to
I would like Harris to take any "congressional action on gun
control" she has in mind, and explain how, if had already been
law, it would have affected the Sandy Hook shooting - or any
other shooting.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 29, 2019, 3:12:36 PM1/29/19
to
That'll be the day. :)

Avenging Angel

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 8:27:18 AM1/30/19
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote in
news:ovg05ehfsgfbl6j5m...@4ax.com:

> https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-gun-cont
> rol-requires-locked-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/?utm_ter
> m=.97a62f0f9d9f
>
> Sen. Kamala D. Harris, the California Democrat and presidential
> aspirant, lamented on Monday the lack of congressional action on gun
> control, saying a solution would have been possible after the 2012
> massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School
> in Newtown, Conn., if only lawmakers had been placed in “a locked
> room, no press, no one, nobody else” and required to examine “the
> autopsy photographs of those babies.”
>
> “And then, you vote your conscience,” she said at a CNN town hall in
> Des Moines. “This has become a political issue.”
>
> Harris, neck and neck with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as America's
> dumbest lawmakers, went on to screech about changing the meaning of
> the word "safety" to mean "gun ban," just as they have changed the
> meaning of the word "man" to mean "whatever the fuck you happen to be
> 'feeling' at the moment."
>
>

I guess the Democrats will have to stage another mass shooting.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 8:31:09 AM1/30/19
to
I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
emotions to get their bills passed, though.

bigdog

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 9:19:56 AM1/30/19
to
And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.

Snit

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 9:37:01 AM1/30/19
to
You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
wall.

So what is the wall REALLY about?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 9:45:33 AM1/30/19
to
==================================================
==================================================
================= WARNING! ========================
**** GOAL POST MOVES AHEAD! ****
================= WARNING! ========================
==================================================
==================================================


>You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>wall.
>
>So what is the wall REALLY about?

Note how Snit's angry trolling desire is so strong he can't bring
himself to comment on this subject. Interesting.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 3:18:44 PM1/30/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

As predicted, Snit angrily runs away from the discussing the subject
at hand. He knows he can't defend Democrats that rely on fear and
emotion whenever they talk about guns.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 3:28:14 PM1/30/19
to
Here is an interesting article about Kamala Harris.

http://groups.google.com/d/msg/Talk.Politics.Guns/rkOPVZdFTEM/GPb5UtdHBwAJ




http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/02/27/gun-laws-in-california-concealed-carry-ruling-appealed-by-attorney-general-kamala-harris/

“Local law enforcement must be able to use their discretion to determine
who can carry a concealed weapon,” said Kamala Harris, who was then the
California Attorney General.

I have always wondered how #BlackLivesMatter would view this. After all,
according to their narrative, cops are just Klansmen with badges who
habitually gun down unarmed black men. How could we trust such people with
discretion to determine who may carry a concealed weapon.

And yet, just yesterday, she tweeted this:

https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/895339395599011848

Today, we remember #MikeBrown and recommit to ensuring truth,
transparency, and trust in our criminal justice system. #BlackLivesMatter


So I wonder if any reporter from the network broadcast and print media would
ask her any of the following questions:

– If the reason that “[l]ocal law enforcement must be able to use their
discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon” is because they
are just Klansmen with badges, why shouldn’t the Stormfront White
Nationalist Community also get to decide who can carry a concealed weapon?

– If the reason that “[l]ocal law enforcement must be able to use their
discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon” is because they
habitually gun down unarmed black men, why shouldn’t the Crips also get to
decide who can carry a concealed weapon?

– Is more black men dead or in prison a worthy price to pay to make lawful
gun ownership more difficult?

– Is making lawful gun ownership more difficult a worthy price to pay to put
more black men in prison?

– Does some magical guardian fairy turn these Klansmen with badges into
freedom riders whenever they exercise their “discretion to determine who can
carry a concealed weapon”?

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 3:29:14 PM1/30/19
to
On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 6:37:01 AM UTC-8, Snit wrote:
> On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> >> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:27:17 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
> >> <Not.fucki...@NoWay.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I guess the Democrats will have to stage another mass shooting.
> >>
> >> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
> >> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
> >
> > And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
> >
> You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
> wall.
>
> So what is the wall REALLY about?
No, we want you to fail at putting more black men in prison for victimless crimes.


Michael

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 3:39:50 PM1/30/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:28:13 -0800 (PST), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 12:18:44 PM UTC-8, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
>> <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> >>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>> >>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>> >>
>> >> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>> >>
>> >You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>> >wall.
>> >
>> >So what is the wall REALLY about?
>>
>> As predicted, Snit angrily runs away from the discussing the subject
>> at hand. He knows he can't defend Democrats that rely on fear and
>> emotion whenever they talk about guns.
>
> Here is an interesting article about Kamala Harris.
>
>http://groups.google.com/d/msg/Talk.Politics.Guns/rkOPVZdFTEM/GPb5UtdHBwAJ
>
>
>
>
>http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/02/27/gun-laws-in-california-concealed-carry-ruling-appealed-by-attorney-general-kamala-harris/
>
> “Local law enforcement must be able to use their discretion to determine
>who can carry a concealed weapon,” said Kamala Harris, who was then the
>California Attorney General.


Yeah, we'll ask them right after they're done playing Russian
Roulette, ya dumb cunt. ROFLMAO

I like how she's all into giving a Special Class of Citizens the power
to decide which rights you can have.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 3:42:59 PM1/30/19
to
It is as if she has never even hears of racial disparities in law enforcement- or just did not care.

Too bad no one in the media ever confronted her about this.


Michael

Snit

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 4:32:37 PM1/30/19
to
On 1/30/19 1:28 PM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 12:18:44 PM UTC-8, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
>> <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>>>
>>>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>>>
>>> You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>>> wall.
>>>
>>> So what is the wall REALLY about?
>>
>> As predicted, Snit angrily runs away from the discussing the subject
>> at hand. He knows he can't defend Democrats that rely on fear and
>> emotion whenever they talk about guns.
>
> Here is an interesting article about Kamala Harris.
>
> http://groups.google.com/d/msg/Talk.Politics.Guns/rkOPVZdFTEM/GPb5UtdHBwAJ
>
>
>
>
> http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/02/27/gun-laws-in-california-concealed-carry-ruling-appealed-by-attorney-general-kamala-harris/
>
> “Local law enforcement must be able to use their discretion to determine
> who can carry a concealed weapon,” said Kamala Harris, who was then the
> California Attorney General.
>
> I have always wondered how #BlackLivesMatter would view this. After all,
> according to their narrative, cops are just Klansmen with badges who
> habitually gun down unarmed black men.

Cite.

> How could we trust such people with
> discretion to determine who may carry a concealed weapon.
>
> And yet, just yesterday, she tweeted this:
>
> https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/895339395599011848
>
> Today, we remember #MikeBrown and recommit to ensuring truth,
> transparency, and trust in our criminal justice system. #BlackLivesMatter
>
>
> So I wonder if any reporter from the network broadcast and print media would
> ask her any of the following questions:
>
> – If the reason that “[l]ocal law enforcement must be able to use their
> discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon” is because they
> are just Klansmen with badges, why shouldn’t the Stormfront White
> Nationalist Community also get to decide who can carry a concealed weapon?
>
> – If the reason that “[l]ocal law enforcement must be able to use their
> discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon” is because they
> habitually gun down unarmed black men, why shouldn’t the Crips also get to
> decide who can carry a concealed weapon?
>
> – Is more black men dead or in prison a worthy price to pay to make lawful
> gun ownership more difficult?
>
> – Is making lawful gun ownership more difficult a worthy price to pay to put
> more black men in prison?
>
> – Does some magical guardian fairy turn these Klansmen with badges into
> freedom riders whenever they exercise their “discretion to determine who can
> carry a concealed weapon”?
>


Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 7:37:27 PM1/30/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

Snit continues to run. Figuring a speed of 20 mph, Snit is now
somewhere near Albuquerque.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 7:43:25 PM1/30/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:32:35 -0700, Snit
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>> I have always wondered how #BlackLivesMatter would view this. After all,
>> according to their narrative, cops are just Klansmen with badges who
>> habitually gun down unarmed black men.
>
>Cite.

Snit again passes up a chance to explain his pathetic goal post move.
As predicted.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 7:44:02 PM1/30/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:42:58 -0800 (PST), Michael Ejercito
They'd have to do their jobs. They don't want to do that.

Avenging Angel

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 7:07:27 AM1/31/19
to
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in
news:gbdr4b...@mid.individual.net:
Do tell stupid, how does disarming victims protect them?

> So what is the wall REALLY about?

To keep out the riff raff.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 8:25:51 AM1/31/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

Snit continues to run from the topic. I predict he will continue to
run until he hits an ocean. His angry fear prevents him from
discussing Harris. Is he involved? Did he take sloppy seconds after
Willie? We'll never know.

Snit

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:10:05 AM1/31/19
to
Klaus responded by showing he has no answer.

Snit

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:10:05 AM1/31/19
to
Straw man.
>
>> So what is the wall REALLY about?
>
> To keep out the riff raff.

Show evidence it would.

And off you run.



Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:32:47 AM1/31/19
to
On 31 Jan 2019 14:10:03 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
Poor Snit- too afraid to deal with the subject at hand, he continues
to run away by trying to CHANGE the subject. Much fear! LOL

I predict he will continue to run.

Snit

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:36:22 AM1/31/19
to
Klaus responded twice showing he has no answer. Weird.


Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:39:32 AM1/31/19
to
On 31 Jan 2019 14:36:20 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
JUST as I predicted, Snit continues to run away with his skirt pulled
up over his head. Why is he so afraid of the subject that he feels the
need to change it? Interesting.

I predict he'll continue to avoid talking about it.

Snit

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:44:17 AM1/31/19
to
Klaus responded three times showing he has no answer. Weird.

I bet he goes for four. He has no self control.


Snit

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:46:21 AM1/31/19
to
Klaus responded five times showing he has no answer. Weird.

I bet he goes for six. He has no self control.


Snit

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:46:22 AM1/31/19
to
I was, of course, right.

Klaus’s failures are trivial to predict.

Snit

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:47:29 AM1/31/19
to
Yup. Klaus is so easy to predict.

It is as if I have a time machine. :)

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:49:23 AM1/31/19
to
On 31 Jan 2019 14:44:15 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
Yet another psychopathic response from Snit as he continues to avoid
the subject.

Why does he angrily change the subject instead of dealing with it? The
answer can only be, he has no response to democrats using emotion and
fear to pass gun legislation, except that he finds it perfectly
acceptable.

He'll continue to deny this, though, and angrily demand we discuss
something else entirely than face up to his own fears.

Interesting.

More on Snit's trolling
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html

Over 100 people ridicule Snit
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html

Typical Snit trolling methods
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:50:58 AM1/31/19
to
On 31 Jan 2019 14:46:19 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:


Snit would MUCH rather discuss this among his psychopathic
personalities instead of admitting he's OK with Democrats using fear
and emotion to pass legislation.

My predictions that he will continue are, of course, 100% correct.

[chuckle]

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:52:19 AM1/31/19
to
On 31 Jan 2019 14:46:19 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:


Once again, Snit continues to reply to himself instead of admitting
that his preferred method of passing anti-gun legislation is through
fear and emotion.

All that talk about his love of "science" is just bunk, as he will
continue to prove by failing to address the subject at hand.

Much fear. Interesting.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:53:43 AM1/31/19
to
On 31 Jan 2019 14:47:27 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:


Note how Snit is so fearful of the topic of democrats using fear and
emotion to pass gun legislation he will continue to reply to himself.

We already know what he really thinks- pictures of dead babies are the
best way to convince people.

Weird.

Snit

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:54:26 AM1/31/19
to
Time machine worked flawlessly.

LOL!

Klaus truly CANNOT help himself.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 9:57:06 AM1/31/19
to
On 31 Jan 2019 14:54:25 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:


The stink of Snit's desperation to escape this subject is palpable
even over usenet!

This is WAY too funny.

And the funny thing is, he'll continue despite his obvious cowardice!

Let's watch as Snit melts down again!

LOL

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 3:15:29 PM1/31/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
Assuming Snit is human and not just a malfunctioning Russian Trollbot,
one presupposes that his angry lashing out about "the wall" in this
thread serves only to cover up his disgust with Kamala's tactic of
forced viewings of dead babies ala "Clockwork Orange" instead of
rational debate, based on logic and science.

His continued screaming this morning about his amateur
subject-changing tactic being exposed can only lead one to believe
that-- not only is he *not* embarrassed by the tactics of his fellow
psychotics-- he, in fact, *endorses* it.

He'll run away from discussing the topic, and his sobs will fade into
the distance as his wife applies his lavender essential oil under his
nose in a vain attempt to calm him.

But he's so angry about citizens being able to own guns that he'll
never admit he's associated himself with freedom-hating goons.




Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Jan 31, 2019, 7:09:29 PM1/31/19
to
Looks like Snit is still crying that I called him out on his subject
change-- he's still running, as I predicted. I figure he must be in
Amarillo by now.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 1, 2019, 3:06:29 PM2/1/19
to
Looks like we made Snit cry-- he's STILL running away from the subject
of Leftists and their dead baby pictures!

LOL

Too funny!


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 2, 2019, 11:51:11 AM2/2/19
to
Where is Snit crying today? Reports indicate that he's locked himself
inside the women's restroom at Love's Country Store on I-40 just east
of Oklahoma City, as he continues to run away from the subject at
hand!

Dry your eyes, Snit. People need to use the facilities! Do Kamala's
dead baby pictures upset you THAT much? LOL

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 7:47:44 AM2/3/19
to
Looks like Love's Country Store on I-40 just east of Oklahoma City has
some good wi-fi. It apparently covers the ladies room where Snit was
crying, since I see he was able to make a few posts last night.

But he still can't bring himself to talk about Kamala "Clockwork
Orange" Harris and her dead babies pictures. Interesting.

I predict he'll continue to run.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 11:52:46 AM2/3/19
to


"Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message
news:agod5eted92d81tfg...@4ax.com...
The truth is to the anti-gun cult like sunlight is to vampires.


Michael


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 11:57:04 AM2/3/19
to
The fact that the Left wants to use emotion and fear to push their
gun-grabbing agenda was too much for poor, crying Snit.

He's probably going to sit through the entire Super Bowl, because he
hears that's what men do. But he'll hate every minute of it.

---

Snit

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 12:02:52 PM2/3/19
to
Our gun problem costs us far more than our problems with illegal
immigration. Care to rethink your claim? :)

> was too much for poor, crying Snit.
>
> He's probably going to sit through the entire Super Bowl, because he
> hears that's what men do. But he'll hate every minute of it.

Super what? Means nothing to me. I have no desire to watch men slap each
other’s butts. But to each their own. Not judging others.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 12:08:25 PM2/3/19
to
Super Bowl.

You know, you don't have to pretend to be ignorant.

It's no longer a secret.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 12:22:24 PM2/3/19
to
On 3 Feb 2019 17:02:50 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

According to Snit, this makes it OK to make decisions based on emotion
and fear. Especially if it's to further the gun-grabbing agenda.

Interesting.

Snit

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 12:44:33 PM2/3/19
to
A self cleaning toilet?

Snit

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 12:44:33 PM2/3/19
to
I say balance risks and benefits. You cannot counter so you lie about my
views. Got it.
>
> ---
> This email

What email?

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 12:48:34 PM2/3/19
to
>A self cleaning toilet?

You're not supposed to begin drinking until AFTER the Super Bowl
begins.

But at least you made my prediction come true, that you're too busy
crying to denounce Kamala "Clockwork Orange" Harris.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 12:50:11 PM2/3/19
to
No. You say use fear and emotion to pass legislation. No need for
facts or logic. Gotcha.

>You cannot counter so you lie about my
>views.

How can I "counter" something you're to busy crying to talk about? LOL

Snit

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 1:55:53 PM2/3/19
to
Meta-debate attacks instead of a discussion. You are insecure... got it.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 2:03:02 PM2/3/19
to
On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 11:55:51 -0700, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
LOL

Poor Snit. He angrily and desperately changed the subject

Message-ID: <gbdr4b...@mid.individual.net>

to avoid talking about Leftists' use of fear and emotion to pass their
gun-grabbing laws, and here he is impotently crying about
"meta-debates."

Too funny!

Snit

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 2:26:24 PM2/3/19
to
I speak for me. Thanks for admitting you cannot refute what I actually
believe and say.

Snit

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 2:26:24 PM2/3/19
to
You drink from your toilet?
>
> But at least you made my prediction come true, that you're too busy
> crying to denounce Kamala "Clockwork Orange" Harris.

Who?
>



Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 7:18:38 PM2/3/19
to
>> But at least you made my prediction come true, that you're too busy
>> crying to denounce Kamala "Clockwork Orange" Harris.
>
>Who?


Note how Snit still angrily evades the subject, choosing instead to
cry and-- apparently-- drink heavily. Interesting.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 3, 2019, 7:20:00 PM2/3/19
to
I speak for you.

You childishly respond with nonsense posts, crying instead of
discussing the subject, just as I predicted you would.


Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 4, 2019, 9:09:03 AM2/4/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:27:17 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
>>> <Not.fucki...@NoWay.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote in
>>>> news:ovg05ehfsgfbl6j5m...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-gun-cont
>>>>> rol-requires-locked-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/?utm_ter
>>>>> m=.97a62f0f9d9f
>>>>>
>>>>> Sen. Kamala D. Harris, the California Democrat and presidential
>>>>> aspirant, lamented on Monday the lack of congressional action on gun
>>>>> control, saying a solution would have been possible after the 2012
>>>>> massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School
>>>>> in Newtown, Conn., if only lawmakers had been placed in “a locked
>>>>> room, no press, no one, nobody else” and required to examine “the
>>>>> autopsy photographs of those babies.”
>>>>>
>>>>> “And then, you vote your conscience,” she said at a CNN town hall in
>>>>> Des Moines. “This has become a political issue.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Harris, neck and neck with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as America's
>>>>> dumbest lawmakers, went on to screech about changing the meaning of
>>>>> the word "safety" to mean "gun ban," just as they have changed the
>>>>> meaning of the word "man" to mean "whatever the fuck you happen to be
>>>>> 'feeling' at the moment."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess the Democrats will have to stage another mass shooting.
>>>
>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>
>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>
>You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>wall.
>
>So what is the wall REALLY about?

Where is Snit today?

Reports say Lebanon, MO. He tried hitchhiking but got tossed out of
the car a few miles later for crying so much.

Will he EVER run out of tears before he accepts the fact that
democrats are trying to pass legislation by fear and emotion? Will he
EVER stop lashing out and trying to change the subject instead of
admitting it?

LOL

Snit

unread,
Feb 4, 2019, 10:32:25 AM2/4/19
to
I back evidence based policies. Where Democrats fail to do so I do not back
them.

But you pretend otherwise because you fear evidence based policies — going
so far as to want to deny the CDC even doing health and safety research on
the topic. Remember you used to call such seeking evidence “bloat”.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Feb 4, 2019, 10:41:55 AM2/4/19
to


"Snit" wrote in message news:gborpn...@mid.individual.net...

>On 2/3/19 9:52 AM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message
>> news:agod5eted92d81tfg...@4ax.com...
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
>>> <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>>>> wall.
>>>>
>>>> So what is the wall REALLY about?
>>
>>> Looks like Love's Country Store on I-40 just east of Oklahoma City has
>>> some good wi-fi. It apparently covers the ladies room where Snit was
>>> crying, since I see he was able to make a few posts last night.
>>
>>> But he still can't bring himself to talk about Kamala "Clockwork
>>> Orange" Harris and her dead babies pictures. Interesting.
>>
>>> I predict he'll continue to run.
>>
>> The truth is to the anti-gun cult like sunlight is to vampires.
>>
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>> https://www.avg.com
>>

>Meta-debate attacks instead of a discussion. You are insecure... got it.
You just can not handle the truth!

http://groups.google.com/d/msg/Talk.Politics.Guns/rkOPVZdFTEM/GPb5UtdHBwAJ




http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/02/27/gun-laws-in-california-concealed-carry-ruling-appealed-by-attorney-general-kamala-harris/

“Local law enforcement must be able to use their discretion to determine
who can carry a concealed weapon,” said Kamala Harris, who was then the
California Attorney General.

I have always wondered how #BlackLivesMatter would view this. After all,
according to their narrative, cops are just Klansmen with badges who
habitually gun down unarmed black men. How could we trust such people with
discretion to determine who may carry a concealed weapon.

And yet, just yesterday, she tweeted this:

https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/895339395599011848

Today, we remember #MikeBrown and recommit to ensuring truth,
transparency, and trust in our criminal justice system. #BlackLivesMatter


So I wonder if any reporter from the network broadcast and print media would
ask her any of the following questions:

– If the reason that “[l]ocal law enforcement must be able to use their
discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon” is because they
are just Klansmen with badges, why shouldn’t the Stormfront White
Nationalist Community also get to decide who can carry a concealed weapon?

– If the reason that “[l]ocal law enforcement must be able to use their
discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon” is because they
habitually gun down unarmed black men, why shouldn’t the Crips also get to
decide who can carry a concealed weapon?

– Is more black men dead or in prison a worthy price to pay to make lawful
gun ownership more difficult?

– Is making lawful gun ownership more difficult a worthy price to pay to put
more black men in prison?

– Does some magical guardian fairy turn these Klansmen with badges into
freedom riders whenever they exercise their “discretion to determine who can
carry a concealed weapon”?

Snit

unread,
Feb 4, 2019, 10:58:43 AM2/4/19
to
Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> "Snit" wrote in message news:gborpn...@mid.individual.net...
>
>> On 2/3/19 9:52 AM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message
>>> news:agod5eted92d81tfg...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
>>>> <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>>>>> wall.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what is the wall REALLY about?
>>>
>>>> Looks like Love's Country Store on I-40 just east of Oklahoma City has
>>>> some good wi-fi. It apparently covers the ladies room where Snit was
>>>> crying, since I see he was able to make a few posts last night.
>>>
>>>> But he still can't bring himself to talk about Kamala "Clockwork
>>>> Orange" Harris and her dead babies pictures. Interesting.
>>>
>>>> I predict he'll continue to run.
>>>
>>> The truth is to the anti-gun cult like sunlight is to vampires.
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>> https://www.avg.com
>>>
>
>> Meta-debate attacks instead of a discussion. You are insecure... got it.
> You just can not handle the truth!

And your support for this is .... ???

The rest of your post has nothing to do with me.

>
> http://groups.google.com/d/msg/Talk.Politics.Guns/rkOPVZdFTEM/GPb5UtdHBwAJ

Not my post.
>
>
>
>
> http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/02/27/gun-laws-in-california-concealed-carry-ruling-appealed-by-attorney-general-kamala-harris/
>
> “Local law enforcement must be able to use their discretion to determine
> who can carry a concealed weapon,” said Kamala Harris, who was then the
> California Attorney General.

What does that have to do with me?

>
> I have always wondered how #BlackLivesMatter would view this. After all,
> according to their narrative, cops are just Klansmen with badges who
> habitually gun down unarmed black men. How could we trust such people with
> discretion to determine who may carry a concealed weapon.
>
> And yet, just yesterday, she tweeted this:
>
> https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/895339395599011848
>
> Today, we remember #MikeBrown and recommit to ensuring truth,
> transparency, and trust in our criminal justice system. #BlackLivesMatter

Again nothing to do with me.
>
>
> So I wonder if any reporter from the network broadcast and print media would
> ask her any of the following questions:

Do you think I am a reporter?

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 4, 2019, 3:12:49 PM2/4/19
to
Snit must be so out of breath from running away crying that he just
can't bring himself to condemn Kamala's emotion and fear-based
policies.

He continues to run away. Interesting.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 4, 2019, 7:31:50 PM2/4/19
to
Snit *STILL* can't bring himself to denounce Kamala's dead baby
pictures.

This provides some real insight into his mental illness(es) and
proclaimed political stances, now proven to be lies. He's not
interested in science.

Fear and emotion are what Snit believes are the ways to pass
legislation.

He'd much rather lash out and demand we start talking about "the wall"
than address this subject. Interesting.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 5, 2019, 8:19:28 AM2/5/19
to
Snit continues to run, now shivering inside the restroom at the Conway
Rest Area near Conway, MO. Women travelers report heavy sobbing coming
from one of the stalls as Snit tries to understand why it's OK for
Kamala Harris to use dead baby photos to pass gun legislation. The
Voices tell him, "lash out and change the subject to the Wall, that
way you don't have to explain it."

But wet, freezing Snit knows he can't get away with that.

He must continue to run away.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 6, 2019, 10:34:38 AM2/6/19
to
Snit continues to run.

Kicked out of the Elbow Inn Bar and BBQ near the Devil's Elbow in
Missouri for lashing out at the patrons, he continues to run in the
freezing rain, imagining what Kamala's dead baby photos might look
like. He knows Democrats love to rule by fear and emotion, and if he
hadn't tried changing the subject to "The Wall" he wouldn't have to
run so far and so fast.

Just as everyone predicted. Interesting.

Steve Carroll

unread,
Feb 6, 2019, 10:58:04 AM2/6/19
to
Just look at mattb's programs and look at bigdog's, there is nothing for anyone to learn from a small time player like mattb. But knock yourself out, let him keep making an ass of himself. It is not like anyone believes him. mattb is regularly seen posting "CANNOT BE FOUND" when it comes to content on a site where it is easy to find... but mattb is just too dopey and/or distracted to recognize any info. Open source is only free if your time has no value. It does not matter because the name on a post means nothing, we know it is from the flooder anyway. I do not know if there is a free open sores program to handle such tasks.



--
One Smart Penny
http://www.5z8.info/warez_w2t4ge_girlsgonewildpart1.wmv
http://www.5z8.info/facebook-of-sex_w4l4wg_bomb
http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot
Jonas Eklundh Communication

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 11:37:42 AM2/7/19
to
He just can not handle the truth about Kamala Harris!

http://groups.google.com/d/msg/Talk.Politics.Guns/rkOPVZdFTEM/GPb5UtdHBwAJ




http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/02/27/gun-laws-in-california-concealed-carry-ruling-appealed-by-attorney-general-kamala-harris/

“Local law enforcement must be able to use their discretion to determine
who can carry a concealed weapon,” said Kamala Harris, who was then the
California Attorney General.

I have always wondered how #BlackLivesMatter would view this. After all,
according to their narrative, cops are just Klansmen with badges who
habitually gun down unarmed black men. How could we trust such people with
discretion to determine who may carry a concealed weapon.

And yet, just yesterday, she tweeted this:

https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/895339395599011848

Today, we remember #MikeBrown and recommit to ensuring truth,
transparency, and trust in our criminal justice system. #BlackLivesMatter


So I wonder if any reporter from the network broadcast and print media would
ask her any of the following questions:

Snit

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 11:42:05 AM2/7/19
to
On 2/7/19 9:37 AM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 7:34:38 AM UTC-8, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
>> <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>>>
>>>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>>>
>>> You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>>> wall.
>>>
>>> So what is the wall REALLY about?
>>
>> Snit continues to run.
>>
>> Kicked out of the Elbow Inn Bar and BBQ near the Devil's Elbow in
>> Missouri for lashing out at the patrons, he continues to run in the
>> freezing rain, imagining what Kamala's dead baby photos might look
>> like. He knows Democrats love to rule by fear and emotion, and if he
>> hadn't tried changing the subject to "The Wall" he wouldn't have to
>> run so far and so fast.
>>
>> Just as everyone predicted. Interesting.
> He just can not handle the truth about Kamala Harris!

What conversation are you even confusing with this one? Where was I
commenting about her? Or are you just begging me to share my views with
her to you... unable to form your own views without hearing what I think?

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 11:46:58 AM2/7/19
to
You might not have noticed, but Kamala Harris was the subject of the original post in this thread.


Michael

Steve Carroll

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 11:54:00 AM2/7/19
to

Steve Carroll

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 12:25:01 PM2/7/19
to
Nobody gets it, I barely understand it.

Frankly I do not really think you understand.

bigdog's reverse compiled Fedora with (I am betting) the MaxCliqueDyn Maximum Clique algorithm to produce posts which are in the form of ones from those of one particular legit member. A flaming bush that never burns, magnified by the reciprocal of an infinite twin prime, demonstrating the vast nothingness of the main character's so-called thought process. Of course, the only concern that matters to bigdog is being "the winner", and if he can't have that he will do more research to successfully beat Just Wondering down... he's been that way for decades.

--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

Snit

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 1:57:24 PM2/7/19
to
And you need me to talk about her... why? Can you not form an opinion
without my input?

I responded to this nonsense:
——
And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
——

Did that somehow trigger you?

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 3:49:29 PM2/7/19
to
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:37:40 -0800 (PST), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 7:34:38 AM UTC-8, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
>> <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> >>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>> >>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>> >>
>> >> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>> >>
>> >You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>> >wall.
>> >
>> >So what is the wall REALLY about?
>>
>> Snit continues to run.
>>
>> Kicked out of the Elbow Inn Bar and BBQ near the Devil's Elbow in
>> Missouri for lashing out at the patrons, he continues to run in the
>> freezing rain, imagining what Kamala's dead baby photos might look
>> like. He knows Democrats love to rule by fear and emotion, and if he
>> hadn't tried changing the subject to "The Wall" he wouldn't have to
>> run so far and so fast.
>>
>> Just as everyone predicted. Interesting.
> He just can not handle the truth about Kamala Harris!
>
>http://groups.google.com/d/msg/Talk.Politics.Guns/rkOPVZdFTEM/GPb5UtdHBwAJ


Of course he can't! As I predicted, he just ran-- and CONTINUES to
run!

LOL

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 3:51:27 PM2/7/19
to
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:42:04 -0700, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>On 2/7/19 9:37 AM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 7:34:38 AM UTC-8, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
>>> <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>>>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>>>>
>>>>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>>>>
>>>> You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>>>> wall.
>>>>
>>>> So what is the wall REALLY about?
>>>
>>> Snit continues to run.
>>>
>>> Kicked out of the Elbow Inn Bar and BBQ near the Devil's Elbow in
>>> Missouri for lashing out at the patrons, he continues to run in the
>>> freezing rain, imagining what Kamala's dead baby photos might look
>>> like. He knows Democrats love to rule by fear and emotion, and if he
>>> hadn't tried changing the subject to "The Wall" he wouldn't have to
>>> run so far and so fast.
>>>
>>> Just as everyone predicted. Interesting.
>> He just can not handle the truth about Kamala Harris!
>
>What conversation are you even confusing with this one?

Snit lashes out in pretend befuddlement. Interesting.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 3:52:39 PM2/7/19
to
On 7 Feb 2019 18:57:21 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>> You might not have noticed, but Kamala Harris was the subject of the
>> original post in this thread.
>>
>>
>> Michael
>>
>
>And you need me to talk about her... why?

Snit continues to lash out in pretend confusion.

At least he's not trying to change the subject to "the wall" after
getting spanked!

LOL

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 8:00:27 PM2/7/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:27:17 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
>>> <Not.fucki...@NoWay.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote in
>>>> news:ovg05ehfsgfbl6j5m...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-gun-cont
>>>>> rol-requires-locked-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/?utm_ter
>>>>> m=.97a62f0f9d9f
>>>>>
>>>>> Sen. Kamala D. Harris, the California Democrat and presidential
>>>>> aspirant, lamented on Monday the lack of congressional action on gun
>>>>> control, saying a solution would have been possible after the 2012
>>>>> massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School
>>>>> in Newtown, Conn., if only lawmakers had been placed in “a locked
>>>>> room, no press, no one, nobody else” and required to examine “the
>>>>> autopsy photographs of those babies.”
>>>>>
>>>>> “And then, you vote your conscience,” she said at a CNN town hall in
>>>>> Des Moines. “This has become a political issue.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Harris, neck and neck with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as America's
>>>>> dumbest lawmakers, went on to screech about changing the meaning of
>>>>> the word "safety" to mean "gun ban," just as they have changed the
>>>>> meaning of the word "man" to mean "whatever the fuck you happen to be
>>>>> 'feeling' at the moment."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess the Democrats will have to stage another mass shooting.
>>>
>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>
>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>
>You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>wall.
>
>So what is the wall REALLY about?

Snit, still running, is sitting in Lewis's Cafe in St. Clair, MO now,
his rage over the Wall building up as he warms himself over a cup of
coffee and a Patty Melt On Rye W/grilled Onions 1/4 Lb ($5.95)

What's with Kamala and her dead baby pictures? Snit is angry with
Kamal now-- just like he's angry at everyone-- for revealing the
normal, typical leftist ploy of trying to rule by fear and emotion.

Heaven knows SNIT has tried it often enough, projecting his fragile
emotions all over usenet, but this is different. This is one of his
heroes casually exposing the Liberal M.O. that's supposed to be kept
secret! Of COURSE Snit had to try to change the subject and divert
everyone's attention! But that didn't work, and now Snit has to run
away, far from his comfy little Prescott manufactured home, and keep
running until people forget.

But WILL they forget?

Snit can't take that chance. He MUST keep running away.

Steve Carroll

unread,
Feb 7, 2019, 9:00:05 PM2/7/19
to
Learning Linux... still a rookie. Now that nobody is talking to Scout, he's making it sound like he's outsmarted max headroom -- when in fact, people are just finally wisening up to his crap.

<giggle>

Everyone is Scout -- the oldest gag in the book.

Anyway, it won't matter because the name on a post does not matter, it's the content that counts.

--
This broke the Internet!
http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM
Jonas Eklundh

Snit

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 1:02:19 AM2/8/19
to
Klaus freaked out over this. He has no answer.

Steve Carroll

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 2:40:41 AM2/8/19
to
Gee, imagine bigdog trying to pin his nonsense on mattb, no one has ever seen that before <shrug>.

Nobody who isn't just using you for wicked aim (isn't a troll) sees you as anything remotely close to good. You have few but bigdog to blame for that.

The Mac has more streamlined workflows. Even Gnome runs better on it.

bigdog has cut down on the hundreds of self-serving, nonsense threads he used to produce but he is really consistent in the truthfulness territory. He simple uses psychological manipulation more to make those circuses.



--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

Avenging Angel

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 7:16:27 AM2/8/19
to
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in
news:gbdr4b...@mid.individual.net:
We're gonna hang dead Democrats from it facing south.

Avenging Angel

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 7:29:09 AM2/8/19
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote in
news:ovg05ehfsgfbl6j5m...@4ax.com:

> https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-gun-cont
> rol-requires-locked-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/?utm_ter
> m=.97a62f0f9d9f
>
> Sen. Kamala D. Harris, the California Democrat and presidential
> aspirant, lamented on Monday the lack of congressional action on gun
> control, saying a solution would have been possible after the 2012
> massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School
> in Newtown, Conn., if only lawmakers had been placed in “a locked
> room, no press, no one, nobody else” and required to examine “the
> autopsy photographs of those babies.”
>
> “And then, you vote your conscience,” she said at a CNN town hall in
> Des Moines. “This has become a political issue.”
>
> Harris, neck and neck with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as America's
> dumbest lawmakers, went on to screech about changing the meaning of
> the word "safety" to mean "gun ban," just as they have changed the
> meaning of the word "man" to mean "whatever the fuck you happen to be
> 'feeling' at the moment."
>
>

Maybe a room full of aborted babies?

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 8:14:38 AM2/8/19
to
On 8 Feb 2019 06:02:18 GMT, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

Snit continues to run away from the subject, as I predicted. Snit
lashes out by angrily replying to himself and desperately pleading to
talk about walls instead.

Interesting.

Steve Carroll

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 8:24:51 AM2/8/19
to
bigdog can't get anything else to work, either.

Hell, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in mockery-quotes just to annoy people) are trying to make Linux become like the Mac. But when the charts were produced, it turns out beyond any doubt, bigdog was far more "fanatical" than he admitted.

bigdog suffers from paranoid drug trips so, to him, everything, even people ignoring him, are "aggressive". Who *doesn't* know this? It's like a crank call. bigdog has already decided what he is going to say before he calls. What you say doesn't matter. What Siri Cruis says is irrelevant.

And in retaliation you have nothing but a crack to start more flooding. Your system will crawl while downloading the mass of flood posts. And it takes a long time.

--
E-commerce Simplified
http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.mac.system/6m_7Z7rQ6Hg
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 8:36:10 AM2/8/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:27:17 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
>>> <Not.fucki...@NoWay.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I guess the Democrats will have to stage another mass shooting.
>>>
>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>
>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>
>You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>wall.
>
>So what is the wall REALLY about?

Hunkered down in Phyl's Chet & Rose's Tavern in Marine, Illinois, Snit
continues to angrily brood. His attempt at changing the subject a
dismal failure, he tries to warm himself before getting 86'd for
lashing out at the other customers. His essential lavender oil supply
now gone, he has no choice but to keep running in the freezing
Illinois rain, just as Klaus predicted he would. He knows this now,
and it makes him very, VERY angry.Perhaps if he pretended to be
Spartacus?

Steve Carroll

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 8:40:06 AM2/8/19
to
On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 6:14:38 AM UTC-7, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
So he changed his story to bigdog posting about his business.

Klaus 'The Shill' Schadenfreude is again seen saying "CANNOT BE FOUND" when it comes to text on a site where information is written with other words... but Klaus 'The Shill' Schadenfreude is just too dumb and/or lost to deduce any info. Right, Klaus 'The Shill' Schadenfreude is wanting to market a web variable, which bigdog can get for free, that I taught myself. If he wasn't so ignorant he would realize how lost he appears.

I suspect we have two different views completely.

--
Top Six Ways Klaus 'The Shill' Schadenfreude Trolls
https://youtu.be/BUjnZhKk1Bg
https://youtu.be/D_so1dvjeyI
Jonas Eklundh Communication

Snit

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 10:17:57 AM2/8/19
to
Right wingers are freaking out... and the amazing thing is they have
themselves to blame. They work to stop the CDC from improving our
knowledge of what works to reduce gun deaths, and then they cry that the
proposed laws are not targeted well.

Snit

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 10:27:14 AM2/8/19
to
On 2/8/19 5:16 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in
> news:gbdr4b...@mid.individual.net:
>
>> On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus
>>> Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:27:17 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
>>>> <Not.fucki...@NoWay.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:ovg05ehfsgfbl6j5m...@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-gun-
>>>>>> cont
>>>>>> rol-requires-locked-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/?utm
>>>>>> _ter m=.97a62f0f9d9f
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sen. Kamala D. Harris, the California Democrat and presidential
>>>>>> aspirant, lamented on Monday the lack of congressional action on
>>>>>> gun control, saying a solution would have been possible after the
>>>>>> 2012 massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook
>>>>>> Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., if only lawmakers had been
>>>>>> placed in “a locked room, no press, no one, nobody else†and
>>>>>> required to examine “the autopsy photographs of those babies.â€
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “And then, you vote your conscience,†she said at a CNN town
>>>>>> hall in Des Moines. “This has become a political issue.â€
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Harris, neck and neck with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as
>>>>>> America's dumbest lawmakers, went on to screech about changing the
>>>>>> meaning of the word "safety" to mean "gun ban," just as they have
>>>>>> changed the meaning of the word "man" to mean "whatever the fuck
>>>>>> you happen to be 'feeling' at the moment."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess the Democrats will have to stage another mass shooting.
>>>>
>>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>>
>>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>>
>> You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want
>> a wall.
>>
>> So what is the wall REALLY about?
>
> We're gonna hang dead Democrats from it facing south.
>

Typical emotional response one would expect from a conservative. Thanks
for proving my point.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 10:29:22 AM2/8/19
to
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 08:27:11 -0700, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>On 2/8/19 5:16 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in
>> news:gbdr4b...@mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus
>>>> Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:27:17 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
>>>>> <Not.fucki...@NoWay.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:ovg05ehfsgfbl6j5m...@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-gun-
>>>>>>> cont
>>>>>>> rol-requires-locked-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/?utm
>>>>>>> _ter m=.97a62f0f9d9f
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sen. Kamala D. Harris, the California Democrat and presidential
>>>>>>> aspirant, lamented on Monday the lack of congressional action on
>>>>>>> gun control, saying a solution would have been possible after the
>>>>>>> 2012 massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook
>>>>>>> Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., if only lawmakers had been
>>>>>>> placed in “a locked room, no press, no one, nobody else�€? and
>>>>>>> required to examine “the autopsy photographs of those babies.�€?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> “And then, you vote your conscience,�€? she said at a CNN town
>>>>>>> hall in Des Moines. “This has become a political issue.�€?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Harris, neck and neck with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as
>>>>>>> America's dumbest lawmakers, went on to screech about changing the
>>>>>>> meaning of the word "safety" to mean "gun ban," just as they have
>>>>>>> changed the meaning of the word "man" to mean "whatever the fuck
>>>>>>> you happen to be 'feeling' at the moment."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess the Democrats will have to stage another mass shooting.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>>>
>>>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>>>
>>> You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want
>>> a wall.
>>>
>>> So what is the wall REALLY about?
>>
>> We're gonna hang dead Democrats from it facing south.
>>
>
>Typical emotional response

I think we all agree yours was a typical, leftist, emotional response.
Instead of talking about dead babies, you angrily attempted to change
the subject, and have been running away crying ever since.

LOL

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 10:30:35 AM2/8/19
to
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 08:17:53 -0700, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
Another angry, desperate attempt by Snit to avoid talking about
Kamala's dead babies at all costs.

ROFLMAO

This is just too good!

I predict he'll continue running and crying.

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 12:16:02 PM2/8/19
to


"Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message
news:j08r5eteh2n3nqrtc...@4ax.com...

>On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 08:27:11 -0700, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
>wrote:

>>On 2/8/19 5:16 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in
>>> news:gbdr4b...@mid.individual.net:
>>>> You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want
>>>> a wall.
>>>>
>>>> So what is the wall REALLY about?
>>>
>>> We're gonna hang dead Democrats from it facing south.
>>>
>>
>>Typical emotional response

>I think we all agree yours was a typical, leftist, emotional response.
>Instead of talking about dead babies, you angrily attempted to change
>the subject, and have been running away crying ever since.

He changed the subject because he could not address the following.

http://groups.google.com/d/msg/Talk.Politics.Guns/rkOPVZdFTEM/GPb5UtdHBwAJ




http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/02/27/gun-laws-in-california-concealed-carry-ruling-appealed-by-attorney-general-kamala-harris/

“Local law enforcement must be able to use their discretion to determine
who can carry a concealed weapon,” said Kamala Harris, who was then the
California Attorney General.

I have always wondered how #BlackLivesMatter would view this. After all,
according to their narrative, cops are just Klansmen with badges who
habitually gun down unarmed black men. How could we trust such people with
discretion to determine who may carry a concealed weapon.

And yet, just yesterday, she tweeted this:

https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/895339395599011848

Today, we remember #MikeBrown and recommit to ensuring truth,
transparency, and trust in our criminal justice system. #BlackLivesMatter


So I wonder if any reporter from the network broadcast and print media would
ask her any of the following questions:

- hide quoted text -
– If the reason that “[l]ocal law enforcement must be able to use their
discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon” is because they
are just Klansmen with badges, why shouldn’t the Stormfront White
Nationalist Community also get to decide who can carry a concealed weapon?

– If the reason that “[l]ocal law enforcement must be able to use their
discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon” is because they
habitually gun down unarmed black men, why shouldn’t the Crips also get to
decide who can carry a concealed weapon?

– Is more black men dead or in prison a worthy price to pay to make lawful
gun ownership more difficult?

– Is making lawful gun ownership more difficult a worthy price to pay to put
more black men in prison?

– Does some magical guardian fairy turn these Klansmen with badges into
freedom riders whenever they exercise their “discretion to determine who can
carry a concealed weapon”?


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

Snit

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 12:19:30 PM2/8/19
to
Your obsession with that story is weird.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 2:40:52 PM2/8/19
to
Snit's doing that a LOT lately- lots of crying and running away.

[chuckle]

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 2:41:44 PM2/8/19
to
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:19:27 -0700, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
>Your obsession with that story is weird.

Your crying and running away has become typical

Snit

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 2:44:15 PM2/8/19
to
Klaus say this and cried. Oh well.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 2:50:43 PM2/8/19
to
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:44:13 -0700, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>On 2/8/19 10:19 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>Your obsession with that story is weird.
>>
>>Your crying and running away has become typical

>Klaus say this and cried. Oh well.

You know Snit's crying hard when he begins to reply to himself and
then tosses in an impotent IKYABWAI response.

LOL

Success!

Snit

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 2:57:21 PM2/8/19
to
On 2/8/19 10:19 AM, Snit wrote:
Klaus continues to cry over this.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 3:09:36 PM2/8/19
to
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:57:18 -0700, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>On 2/8/19 10:19 AM, Snit wrote:

>Klaus continues to cry over this.

Snit continues to reply to himself. I love how he angrily complains
about people changing topics in other threads, ignoring his own
hypocrisy when it suits him.

It's ALWAYS fun to rub his nose in it, like the angry, sobbing pup
we've made him!

LOL

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 8, 2019, 7:39:46 PM2/8/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:27:17 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
>>> <Not.fucki...@NoWay.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote in
>>>> news:ovg05ehfsgfbl6j5m...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-gun-cont
>>>>> rol-requires-locked-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/?utm_ter
>>>>> m=.97a62f0f9d9f
>>>>>
>>>>> Sen. Kamala D. Harris, the California Democrat and presidential
>>>>> aspirant, lamented on Monday the lack of congressional action on gun
>>>>> control, saying a solution would have been possible after the 2012
>>>>> massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School
>>>>> in Newtown, Conn., if only lawmakers had been placed in “a locked
>>>>> room, no press, no one, nobody else” and required to examine “the
>>>>> autopsy photographs of those babies.”
>>>>>
>>>>> “And then, you vote your conscience,” she said at a CNN town hall in
>>>>> Des Moines. “This has become a political issue.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Harris, neck and neck with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as America's
>>>>> dumbest lawmakers, went on to screech about changing the meaning of
>>>>> the word "safety" to mean "gun ban," just as they have changed the
>>>>> meaning of the word "man" to mean "whatever the fuck you happen to be
>>>>> 'feeling' at the moment."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess the Democrats will have to stage another mass shooting.
>>>
>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>
>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>
>You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>wall.
>
>So what is the wall REALLY about?

In his efforts to run away from the subject being discussed, Snit only
made it a few miles down the road, to the Pub 36 in the aptly-named
Pocahontas, Illinois. He works on one in a series of $2 longnecks, but
the solution to his problems don't become any clearer. Chubby local
girls try to engage him in conversation but he angrily lashes out, and
they move away. He's hoping to sleep under the I-70 underpass
tonight, and ponder why he's so afraid to talk about Kamala and her
dead babies. But that answer will never come.

Snit continues to run.

Avenging Angel

unread,
Feb 9, 2019, 7:45:17 AM2/9/19
to

Avenging Angel

unread,
Feb 9, 2019, 7:48:26 AM2/9/19
to
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in
news:gc5kt1...@mid.individual.net:
You have an interesting ability to not respond to what's posted but
instead puking up more of your piosonous vomit.

So, what do you think about post birth abortions? Apparently the
Democrats favor them.

So do I. For Democrats.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 10, 2019, 8:12:34 AM2/10/19
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:36:59 -0700, Snit
<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 1/30/19 7:19 AM, bigdog wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:27:17 -0000 (UTC), Avenging Angel
>>> <Not.fucki...@NoWay.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@null.net> wrote in
>>>> news:ovg05ehfsgfbl6j5m...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-gun-cont
>>>>> rol-requires-locked-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/?utm_ter
>>>>> m=.97a62f0f9d9f
>>>>>
>>>>> Sen. Kamala D. Harris, the California Democrat and presidential
>>>>> aspirant, lamented on Monday the lack of congressional action on gun
>>>>> control, saying a solution would have been possible after the 2012
>>>>> massacre of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School
>>>>> in Newtown, Conn., if only lawmakers had been placed in “a locked
>>>>> room, no press, no one, nobody else” and required to examine “the
>>>>> autopsy photographs of those babies.”
>>>>>
>>>>> “And then, you vote your conscience,” she said at a CNN town hall in
>>>>> Des Moines. “This has become a political issue.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Harris, neck and neck with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as America's
>>>>> dumbest lawmakers, went on to screech about changing the meaning of
>>>>> the word "safety" to mean "gun ban," just as they have changed the
>>>>> meaning of the word "man" to mean "whatever the fuck you happen to be
>>>>> 'feeling' at the moment."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess the Democrats will have to stage another mass shooting.
>>>
>>> I'm enjoying how they openly admit they have to use fear and other
>>> emotions to get their bills passed, though.
>>
>> And still they fail. They'll just have to hope for bigger massacres.
>>
>You want people to fail at protecting Americans... yet you still want a
>wall.
>
>So what is the wall REALLY about?

Snit has run so far from his warm Prescott manufactured home he can
barely remember why. He finds himself in St. Elmo, and thinks of his
favorite cartoon character. He remembers those mornings sitting in
front of the TV with a bowl of Lucky Charms, watching sweet, sweet
Elmo. "Why can't the world be like that," he could ask himself.

But the world wants answers-- in particular-- "Why are you trying to
change the subject to 'walls?' Are you afraid to discuss Kamala's use
of dead babies to further her gun-grabbing agenda? Are you afraid to
discuss Democrats' CEASELESS use of fear and emotion to pass
legislation?"

Snit knows he can't answer these questions, and leaving Elmo behind,
he has to run away. He MUST run. Challenging his liberal beliefs would
only cause him to have to think for himself, and Snit is not ready for
that.

Snit finds an unlocked door at the First United Methodist Church and
sneaks inside, laying down on a pew to sleep. Pastor Laack notices the
smelly, wet form but says nothing. Later he will explain, "I sensed an
aura of anger and fear, as if something was chasing him. He looked
like he had been running from something for a long time."

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 11, 2019, 7:35:16 AM2/11/19
to
Snit, still tearfully running away from Kamala's dead baby pictures,
finds himself at the Zimmarss Restaurant in Terre Haute, Indiana. As a
liberal, he finds himself strangely comfortable here, not knowing that
in 1923 it was the site of one of the largest Ku Klux Klan rallies
ever held. Munching on his Fried Cod Fish Sandwich ($6), he notices
how friendly all the men are here, and decides to not lash out at them
before he continues running away.

Snit

unread,
Feb 11, 2019, 7:52:04 AM2/11/19
to
Klaus clearly has no idea. Below he freaks out.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages