Youtube: 80% daily videos available in WebM?

95 views
Skip to first unread message

yishan

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 3:05:37 AM1/27/11
to WebM Discussion
In one presentation last year,
http://www.streamingmedia.com/conferences/west2010/presentations/SMWest-2010-WebM.pdf,
it was said "YouTube HTML5 beta (80% daily videos available in WebM)".

However, when looking YouTube, many videos are still not having WebM
choice (I do see WebM ones, but rare, at least not 80% of all Youtube
videos).

Does somebody illustrate the meaning of "80%"?

Mike Melanson

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 3:26:05 AM1/27/11
to webm-d...@webmproject.org

When you see stats like that, the fine print tends to read "80% of the
videos that people actually *care* about." So, 80% of the most commonly
viewed videos. The long tail of video has not necessarily been
transcoded yet.

--
-Mike Melanson

yishan

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 6:19:53 AM1/27/11
to WebM Discussion
Thank for the response.
After some trial I found clips with viewer count larger than 500,000
will have webm format in high probability.
I originally thought webm will apply to all NEW videos to fasten the
deployment, if removing H.264 is the goal...

On 1月27日, 下午4時26分, Mike Melanson <m...@multimedia.cx> wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 12:05 AM, yishan wrote:
>
> > In one presentation last year,
> >http://www.streamingmedia.com/conferences/west2010/presentations/SMWe...,

Steve Lhomme

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 3:33:25 AM1/27/11
to webm-d...@webmproject.org
At first they only did the ones available in HD. Maybe they don't
encode the low resolution ones yet.

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "WebM Discussion" group.
> To post to this group, send email to webm-d...@webmproject.org.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> webm-discuss...@webmproject.org.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/group/webm-discuss/?hl=en.
>
>

--
Steve Lhomme
Matroska association Chairman

Steve Lhomme

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 6:56:23 AM1/27/11
to webm-d...@webmproject.org
I don't think removing H.264 will be possible for many years to come.

antistress

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 9:03:09 AM1/27/11
to WebM Discussion
I confirm that a lot of new videos don't have webm version... which i
don't understand ?

Phillip

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 10:38:44 AM1/27/11
to WebM Discussion

On 27 Jan., 15:03, antistress <thibaut.beth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I confirm that a lot of new videos don't have webm version... which i
> don't understand ?

Did you take into account that at the moment videos with ads are
always shown in the Flash player?

Phillip


Andy Berkheimer

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 11:39:38 AM1/27/11
to webm-d...@webmproject.org
Correct - as of today webm encoding at youtube is still selectively enabled for videos provided to us at HD resolution or already in the WebM format.

We are continually re-evaluating this selectivity and if you want to help get rid of it, the best thing to do is to make the vp8 encoder faster. There's been a lot of good work in this direction over the past few months, and it's all in the public libvpx git repository...

-Andy

Vladimir Pantelic

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 12:54:08 PM1/27/11
to webm-d...@webmproject.org

until the <ads> tag support has been added? :)

antistress

unread,
Jan 27, 2011, 4:31:25 PM1/27/11
to WebM Discussion
Yes, i'm aware of that. However a lot of recent SD videos without ads
nor annotations are not available in WebM.
Therefore if only a few of new videos are available in WebM, the gap
will keep on growing. We're not even talking of reducing the gap :-/

rastalo...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 25, 2015, 5:48:44 PM2/25/15
to webm-d...@webmproject.org, cch...@gmail.com, rastalo...@gmail.com
ThANk^S,.,,...
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages